首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >417 An Evaluation Of Digestibility and Caloric Value Of Different Botanical Parts Of Corn Residues Fed To Cattle.
【2h】

417 An Evaluation Of Digestibility and Caloric Value Of Different Botanical Parts Of Corn Residues Fed To Cattle.

机译:417对饲喂牛的玉米残留物不同植物部位的消化率和热值的评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Grazing cattle often select diets with greater digestibility and presumably greater energy concentration in comparison to the average of the overall biomass available for grazing. Thus, estimates of diet energy based on measures of concentrations of chemical components in samples of mechanically harvested corn residues are unlikely to be strongly correlated to diets selected by grazing cattle. We used 6 ruminally cannulated cows in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square experiment to determine energy balance, apparent nutrient digestibility and N retention using indirect respiration calorimetry in cattle fed diets of individual components of corn residues. Gross energy intake was greater (P < 0.01) when cows were fed leaf (18.0 Mcal/d) compared to husk and stalk (13.0 and 12.8 Mcal/d, respectively). Digestible energy (% of GE) was least (P < 0.01) and fecal energy was greatest (P < 0.01) when cows were fed stalk compared to husk or leaf. Metabolizable energy (% of DE) was greatest (P < 0.01) for leaf, intermediate for husk and least for stalk. Interestingly, energy lost as methane (% of DE) was nearly 68% greater when cattle were fed husk or stalk compared to leaf. Heat production (Mcal/d) during feeding or fasting was not different (P ≥ 0.81) when cows were fed leaf, husk or stalk. Subsequently, NEm (Mcal/kg DMI) was greatest (P < 0.01) for leaf (1.46) than husk (0.90) or stalk (0.68). Retained N was greatest (P < 0.01) for cows fed leaf compared to husk and stalk. Despite differences in measures of NEm and N retention, total-tract digestion of NDF and ADF were greatest (P < 0.01) for husks, least for stalks and intermediate for leaf. Overall, these data indicate that differences in total-tract digestion and ruminal methane production impact energy available to grazing cattle from different components of corn residue.
机译:与可用于放牧的总生物量的平均值相比,放牧的牛通常选择消化率更高且能量浓度更高的饲料。因此,基于机械收割的玉米残渣样品中化学成分浓度的测量值所估算的日粮能量不太可能与放牧牛所选择的日粮强烈相关。我们在一个重复的3 x 3拉丁方实验中使用了6只反刍动物插管的奶牛,通过间接呼吸量热法在牛饲喂玉米残渣各个成分的日粮中确定了能量平衡,表观养分消化率和氮保留。与以稻壳和秸秆(分别为13.0和12.8 Mcal / d)相比,给母牛饲喂叶子(18.0 Mcal / d)时的总能量摄入量更大(P <0.01)。与谷壳或树叶相比,饲喂秸秆的母牛的消化能(占GE的百分比)最小(P <0.01),粪便能最大(P <0.01)。叶片的可代谢能量(DE的百分比)最大(P <0.01),果壳为中间,茎为最小。有趣的是,饲喂牛壳或秸秆时,与甲烷相比,甲烷的能量损失(DE的百分比)高出近68%。饲喂或饲喂牛时,饲喂或禁食时的产热量(Mcal / d)均无差异(P≥0.81)。随后,叶片(1.46)的NEm(Mcal / kg DMI)最大(P <0.01),高于果壳(0.90)或茎(0.68)。与稻壳和秸秆相比,饲喂叶的母牛的保留氮最大(P <0.01)。尽管NEm和N保留量的测量方法有所不同,但全皮NDF和ADF的总消化率最大(P <0.01),其中壳,茎的最低,叶片的中间。总体而言,这些数据表明,总消化率和瘤胃甲烷产量的差异影响了来自玉米残渣不同成分的放牧牛的可用能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号