首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Seven Techniques for Typing International Epidemic Strains of Clostridium difficile: Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis PCR-Ribotyping Multilocus Sequence Typing Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism and Surface Layer Protein A Gene Sequence Typing
【2h】

Comparison of Seven Techniques for Typing International Epidemic Strains of Clostridium difficile: Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis PCR-Ribotyping Multilocus Sequence Typing Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism and Surface Layer Protein A Gene Sequence Typing

机译:区分艰难梭菌国际流行菌株的七种技术的比较:限制性内切核酸酶分析脉冲场凝胶电泳PCR核糖体分型多基因座序列分型多基因座可变数串联重复分析扩增的片段长度多态性和表面层蛋白A基因序列分型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using 42 isolates contributed by laboratories in Canada, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States, we compared the results of analyses done with seven Clostridium difficile typing techniques: multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), surface layer protein A gene sequence typing (slpAST), PCR-ribotyping, restriction endonuclease analysis (REA), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). We assessed the discriminating ability and typeability of each technique as well as the agreement among techniques in grouping isolates by allele profile A (AP-A) through AP-F, which are defined by toxinotype, the presence of the binary toxin gene, and deletion in the tcdC gene. We found that all isolates were typeable by all techniques and that discrimination index scores for the techniques tested ranged from 0.964 to 0.631 in the following order: MLVA, REA, PFGE, slpAST, PCR-ribotyping, MLST, and AFLP. All the techniques were able to distinguish the current epidemic strain of C. difficile (BI/027/NAP1) from other strains. All of the techniques showed multiple types for AP-A (toxinotype 0, binary toxin negative, and no tcdC gene deletion). REA, slpAST, MLST, and PCR-ribotyping all included AP-B (toxinotype III, binary toxin positive, and an 18-bp deletion in tcdC) in a single group that excluded other APs. PFGE, AFLP, and MLVA grouped two, one, and two different non-AP-B isolates, respectively, with their AP-B isolates. All techniques appear to be capable of detecting outbreak strains, but only REA and MLVA showed sufficient discrimination to distinguish strains from different outbreaks.
机译:使用加拿大,荷兰,英国和美国实验室提供的42种分离株,我们比较了7种艰难梭菌分型技术的分析结果:多基因座可变数串联重复分析(MLVA),扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP),表面层蛋白A基因序列分型(slpAST),PCR核糖体分型,限制性内切核酸酶分析(REA),多基因座序列分型(MLST)和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)。我们评估了每种技术的区分能力和类型性,以及通过等位基因图谱A(AP-A)通过AP-F将分离物分组的技术之间的一致性,这些特征由毒素类型,二进制毒素基因的存在和缺失定义在tcdC基因中。我们发现所有分离株均可通过所有技术进行分型,并且所测试技术的辨别指数得分范围从0.964至0.631,依次为:MLVA,REA,PFGE,slpAST,PCR核糖体分型,MLST和AFLP。所有技术都能够将当前的艰难梭菌流行株(BI / 027 / NAP1)与其他菌株区分开。所有的技术都显​​示出AP-A的多种类型(毒素型0,二元毒素阴性和无tcdC基因缺失)。 REA,slpAST,MLST和PCR核糖体分型均在排除其他AP的单个组中包括AP-B(毒素型III,二进制毒素阳性和tcdC中18 bp缺失)。 PFGE,AFLP和MLVA分别将两个,一个和两个不同的非AP-B分离物及其AP-B分离物分组。所有技术似乎都能够检测暴发菌株,但只有REA和MLVA表现出足够的区分能力,可将菌株与不同暴发区分开。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号