首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology >Editorial Comment: Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial
【2h】

Editorial Comment: Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:社论评论:接受舒尼替尼治疗的同步转移性肾细胞癌患者立即进行和延迟行细胞还原肾切除术的比较:SURTIME随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Authors presented data from a waited prospective study, SURTIME, which evaluated the best time of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN)and target therapy with sunitinib in two groups: CN performed before sunitinib versus Upfront CN followed by the therapy. Despite its low number of recruited patients (99) due a poor accrual (it was planned for 458 patients), authors found that the progression free survival at 28 weeks in intention to treat analysis, was similar in both groups. However, the overall survival was superior in patients on deferred surgical arm. This study was important in verify that the use of sunitinib before surgery can helps in identification of patients resistant to this drug and that probably will be not benefited with the surgery. On the other hand, a patients with satisfactory response to sunitinib can be maintained as suitable surgical candidates. Additionally, the patients on deferred CN arm received more frequently the drug in comparison the group of immediate nephrectomies. Although the results can influence our therapeutic decisions, caution in necessary: We must not to extrapolate these results for patients with no clear cell hystologies of kidney cancer, or for patients presenting with poor performance status or with central nervous system metastasis, since they were exclude from the SURTIME population. We do not know if the future, these findings will be replaced in similar way on trials that are using modern immunotherapy or using immunotherapy in combination with target therapies before or after cytoreduction. Let's wait for this new data.
机译:作者提供了来自等待中的前瞻性研究SURTIME的数据,该研究评估了细胞舒缓性肾切除术(CN)和舒尼替尼靶向治疗的最佳时间,分为两组:舒尼替尼之前进行的CN对比Upfront CN进行的治疗。尽管由于应收率低(计划458名患者)而招募的患者数量较少(99名),但作者发现,意图进行分析的28周无进展生存期两组相似。然而,延迟手术臂的患者的总生存期更高。这项研究对于验证手术前使用舒尼替尼可以帮助识别对该药产生耐药性的患者并且可能不会从手术中受益至关重要。另一方面,对舒尼替尼有满意反应的患者可以维持为合适的手术候选者。另外,与即刻肾切除术组相比,延期CN臂治疗的患者更频繁地接受药物治疗。尽管结果可能会影响我们的治疗决策,但请务必注意:对于没有明确肾细胞学性肾功能不全的患者,表现状态较差或中枢神经系统转移的患者,我们不得推断这些结果来自SURTIME人口。我们不知道将来是否会以类似的方式将这些发现替换为在细胞减少之前或之后使用现代免疫疗法或将免疫疗法与目标疗法相结合的试验。让我们等待这些新数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号