首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Differential Sensitivities of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Spike Polypeptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and SARS Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein ELISA for Serodiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus Pneumonia
【2h】

Differential Sensitivities of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Spike Polypeptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and SARS Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein ELISA for Serodiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus Pneumonia

机译:严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)冠状病毒穗状多肽酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和SARS冠状病毒核衣壳蛋白ELISA对SARS冠状病毒性肺炎的血清学诊断的敏感性差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) nucleocapsid protein (N) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based antibody and antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV infections have been widely reported. However, no recombinant SARS-CoV spike protein (S)-based ELISA is currently available. In this article, we describe the problems and solutions of setting up the recombinant SARS-CoV S-based ELISA for antibody detection. The SARS-CoV S-based immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG ELISAs were evaluated and compared with the corresponding N-based ELISA for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV pneumonia, using sera from 148 healthy blood donors who donated blood 3 years ago as controls and 95 SARS-CoV pneumonia patients in Hong Kong. Results obtained by the recombinant S (rS)-based IgG ELISA using the regenerated S prepared by dialysis with decreasing concentrations of urea or direct addition of different coating buffers, followed by addition of different regeneration buffer, identified 4 M urea and 1 M sarcosine for plate coating and no regeneration buffer as the most optimal conditions for antibody detection. The specificities of the S-based ELISA for IgG and IgM detection were 98.6% and 93.9%, with corresponding sensitivities of 58.9% and 74.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of the rN IgG ELISA (94.7%) is significantly higher than that of the rS IgG ELISA (P < 0.001), whereas the sensitivity of the rS IgM ELISA is significantly higher than that of the rN IgM ELISA (55.2%) (P < 0.01). An ELISA for detection of IgM against S and N could be more sensitive than one that detects IgM against N alone for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV pneumonia.
机译:广泛报道了基于重组严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)核衣壳蛋白(N)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的抗体和抗原测试用于诊断SARS-CoV感染。但是,目前尚无基于重组SARS-CoV穗蛋白(S)的ELISA。在本文中,我们描述了建立用于抗体检测的重组SARS-CoV S基ELISA的问题和解决方案。以3年前献血的148名健康献血者的血清作为对照,评估了SARS-CoV S型免疫球蛋白M(IgM)和IgG ELISA,并将其与相应的N基ELISA进行血清学诊断,比较了SARS-CoV肺炎的血清学。香港共有95名SARS冠状病毒性肺炎患者。通过重组S(rS)的IgG ELISA所获得的结果,使用通过降低尿素浓度透析或直接添加不同包被缓冲液,然后添加不同的再生缓冲液透析制备的再生S,鉴定出4 M尿素和1 M肌氨酸板涂层和无再生缓冲液是检测抗体的最佳条件。基于S的ELISA对IgG和IgM检测的特异性分别为98.6%和93.9%,相应的灵敏度分别为58.9%和74.7%。 rN IgG ELISA的敏感性(94.7%)显着高于rS IgG ELISA的敏感性(P <0.001),而rS IgM ELISA的敏感性显着高于rN IgM ELISA的敏感性(55.2%)( P <0.01)。用于检测针对S和N的IgM的ELISA比用于针对SARS-CoV肺炎的血清诊断单独检测针对N的IgM的ELISA可能更敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号