首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diagnostics >Comparing the Japanese Version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score for Dry Eye Symptom Assessment
【2h】

Comparing the Japanese Version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score for Dry Eye Symptom Assessment

机译:日语版眼表疾病指数和与干眼症相关的生活质量评分的干眼症症状评估比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) between the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI) and the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS). A total of 169 participants were enrolled between September 2017 and May 2018. Patients were administered the J-OSDI and DEQS questionnaires at their first (baseline) and follow-up visits to evaluate DED-related symptoms. The correlations between the J-OSDI total score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) scores were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and their clinical differences were assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis. At the baseline visit, the J-OSDI score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) were significantly correlated ( = 0.855, = 0.897, respectively). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between the J-OSDI score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) at the follow-up visit ( = 0.852, = 0.888, respectively). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed a difference (bias) of 4.18 units at the baseline and 4.08 units at the follow-up between the scores of the two questionnaires. The J-OSDI and DEQS were significantly correlated with negligible score differences, suggesting that the J-OSDI can be reliably used for Japanese patients, allowing for cross-country comparisons.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较日文版眼表疾病指数(J-OSDI)和与干眼相关的生活质量评分(DEQS)之间患者报告的干眼疾病(DED)症状。在2017年9月至2018年5月之间,共有169名参与者入组。患者在首次(基线)随访时接受J-OSDI和DEQS问卷调查,以评估与DED相关的症状。使用Pearson相关系数评估J-OSDI总评分与DEQS(频率和程度)评分之间的相关性,并使用Bland-Altman分析评估其临床差异。在基线访视时,J-OSDI评分和DEQS(频率和程度)显着相关(分别为0.855、0.897)。此外,在随访中发现J-OSDI评分与DEQS(频率和程度)之间存在显着相关性(分别为0.852和0.888)。 Bland–Altman分析显示,两个问卷的得分之间的基线偏差为4.18单位,随访时为4.08单位。 J-OSDI和DEQS与可忽略的得分差异显着相关,这表明J-OSDI可以可靠地用于日本患者,从而可以进行跨国比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号