首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antibiotics >Knowledge Perceptions and Practices of Community Pharmacists Towards Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Systematic Scoping Review
【2h】

Knowledge Perceptions and Practices of Community Pharmacists Towards Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Systematic Scoping Review

机译:社区药剂师对抗菌素管理的知识认识和实践:系统的研究范围

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The scope of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) surveys on community pharmacists (CPs) is uncertain. This study examines the breadth and quality of AMS survey tools measuring the stewardship knowledge, perceptions and practices (KPP) of CPs and analyse survey outcomes. Following PRISMA-ScR checklist and Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework seven medical databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened the literatures, assessed quality of surveys and KPP outcomes were analysed and described. Ten surveys were identified that assessed CPs’ AMS perceptions ( = 7) and practices ( = 8) but none that assessed AMS knowledge. Three survey tools had been formally validated. Most CPs perceived that AMS improved patient care (median 86.0%, IQR, 83.3–93.5%, = 6), and reduced inappropriate antibiotic use (84.0%, IQR, 83–85%, = 2). CPs collaborated with prescribers for infection control (54.7%, IQR 34.8–63.2%, = 4) and for uncertain antibiotic treatment (77.0%, IQR 55.2–77.8%, = 5). CPs educated patients (53.0%, IQR, 43.2–67.4%, = 5) and screened guideline-compliance of antimicrobial prescriptions (47.5%, IQR, 25.2–58.3%, = 3). Guidelines, training, interactions with prescribers, and reimbursement models were major barriers to CP-led AMS implementation. A limited number of validated survey tools are available to assess AMS perceptions and practices of CPs. AMS survey tools require further development to assess stewardship knowledge, stewardship targets, and implementation by CPs.
机译:对社区药剂师(CP)进行抗菌管理(AMS)调查的范围尚不确定。这项研究检查了AMS调查工具的广度和质量,这些工具测量了CP的管理知识,感知和实践(KPP),并分析了调查结果。按照PRISMA-ScR清单以及Arksey和O’Malley的方法框架,搜索了七个医学数据库。两名审稿人独立筛选了文献,对评估的调查质量和KPP结果进行了分析和描述。确定了十项调查,以评估CP的AMS感知(= 7)和实践(= 8),但没有一项评估AMS知识。三种调查工具已得到正式验证。大多数CP认为AMS改善了患者护理(中位数为86.0%,IQR,83.3–93.5%,= 6),并减少了不适当的抗生素使用(84.0%,IQR,83–85%,= 2)。 CP与处方者合作进行感染控制(54.7%,IQR 34.8–63.2%,= 4)和不确定的抗生素治疗(77.0%,IQR 55.2–77.8%,= 5)。 CPs对患者进行了教育(53.0%,IQR,43.2–67.4%,= 5)并筛选了抗菌药物处方的指南依从性(47.5%,IQR,25.2–58.3%,= 3)。指南,培训,与处方者的互动以及报销模型是CP领导的AMS实施的主要障碍。有限数量的经过验证的调查工具可用于评估AMS对CP的感知和实践。 AMS调查工具需要进一步开发,以评估管理知识,管理目标以及CP的执行情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号