首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Collaborative Everyday Problem Solving among Same-gender Friends in Early and Later Adulthood
【2h】

Collaborative Everyday Problem Solving among Same-gender Friends in Early and Later Adulthood

机译:成年早期和成年后同性朋友之间的协作性日常问题解决

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To investigate potential age-related differences in performance gains (compensation, optimization) and losses (failure to actualize potential) of collaboration with a familiar partner, we compared pairs of older (N= 75; 69% women) and younger (N = 75; 52% women) age homogeneous same-gender friends who interacted or worked alone to generate strategies for solving interpersonal and instrumental problems. Two indexes of strategy fluency (total and unique number of strategies) and two indexes of strategy type (content of strategy repertoires, strategy selected as most effective by older and younger adults) were examined. Strategies generated by interacting pairs were compared to nominal pair scores. Nominal pair scores indexed dyadic potential and were created by pooling the performance of two individuals who worked alone. Age differences in strategy fluency and type were largely similar to prior research based on individual problem solvers. Interacting pairs produced fewer strategies than nominal pairs but there were no differences in strategy type. For interpersonal problems, older adults were relatively more likely to actualize their dyadic potential.
机译:为了调查与一个熟悉的伙伴的合作在性能提升(补偿,优化)和损失(未能实现潜力)方面与年龄相关的潜在差异,我们比较了成年(N = 75; 69%女性)和年轻(N = 75)对; 52%的女性)同龄同性朋友,他们互动或独自工作以解决人际关系和工具问题。研究了两个策略策略流利性指标(策略总数和唯一性)和两个策略类型指标(策略库的内容,老年人选择的最有效策略)。将互动对产生的策略与名义对得分进行比较。标称配对分数索引了二进位潜力,是通过合并两个单独工作的个人的表现而创建的。策略流利度和类型的年龄差异与基于个别问题解决者的先前研究在很大程度上相似。交互对产生的策略少于标称对,但是策略类型没有差异。对于人际关系问题,老年人相对更有可能实现其二元潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号