首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Oxford House and Alcoholics Anonymous: The Impact of Two Mutual-help Models on Abstinence
【2h】

Oxford House and Alcoholics Anonymous: The Impact of Two Mutual-help Models on Abstinence

机译:牛津大学众议院和戒酒者的匿名:两种互助模式对节制的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two examples of mutual-help approaches for substance abuse recovery are 12-step groups (AA and NA) and Oxford House. The present study examined the combined effects of AA and Oxford House residence on abstinence over a 24-month period with 150 individuals randomly assigned to either an Oxford House or to usual after-care. Among individuals with high 12-step involvement, the addition of Oxford House residence significantly increased the odds of abstinence (87.5% vs. 52.9%). However, among participants with low 12-step involvement, rates of abstinence were fairly similar across conditions (31.4% vs. 21.2%). Results suggested that the joint effectiveness of these mutual-help programs may promote abstinence.
机译:12个步骤的小组(AA和NA)和牛津大学(Oxford House)是帮助滥用药物的互助方法的两个例子。本研究检查了AA和牛津大学住宅对禁欲在24个月内的综合影响,并随机分配了150个人到牛津大学或普通的后期护理。在具有12个步骤的高度参与的个人中,增加牛津大学住宅的机会明显增加了禁欲的几率(87.5%对52.9%)。但是,在12步参与度较低的参与者中,各种情况下的节制率相当相似(31.4%对21.2%)。结果表明,这些互助计划的共同效力可能会促进节欲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号