首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Parental income and the fruits of labor: Variability in homework efficacy in secondary school
【2h】

Parental income and the fruits of labor: Variability in homework efficacy in secondary school

机译:父母收入和劳动力成果:中学家庭作业疗效的可变性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research in the sociology of education has shown that noncognitive traits are important predictors of educational outcomes and a mechanism of the intergenerational transmission of status. However, previous research on this topic typically posits that there is a constant effect of these traits with variable prevalences of these traits by socioeconomic status. Using time spent on homework as an example, I analyze income-based heterogeneity in homework efficacy, defined as the individual effect of study time on academic achievement, using a national U.S. probability sample of secondary students. Higher income students gain more knowledge from their homework time than their counterparts in all grades and all subjects except history, with greater group differences for math than for science and reading. These results are confirmed by models accounting for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity in the 8th–10th, but not 10th–12th, grade windows. These results imply that increases in the amount of homework assigned may increase the socioeconomic achievement gap in math, science, and reading in secondary school.
机译:教育社会学研究表明,非认知特征是教育成果的重要预测指标,是状态代际传递的机制。但是,以前有关该主题的研究通常认为,由于社会经济地位的不同,这些特征的持续流行与这些特征的流行有关。以花在家庭作业上的时间为例,我使用美国国家中学生的概率样本分析了家庭作业效能中基于收入的异质性,定义为学习时间对学习成绩的个体影响。高收入的学生从功课中获得的知识要比所有年级和所有科目(历史除外)的同学要多,与数学和科学和阅读相比,数学上的群体差异更大。这些结果已得到模型的证实,该模型解释了在8-10年级,但在10-12年级窗中没有时变的未观察到的异质性。这些结果表明,增加作业分配量可能会增加中学数学,科学和阅读方面的社会经济成就差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号