首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Easy and Accurate Calculation of Programmed Temperature Gas Chromatographic Retention Times by Back-Calculation of Temperature and Hold-up Time Profiles
【2h】

Easy and Accurate Calculation of Programmed Temperature Gas Chromatographic Retention Times by Back-Calculation of Temperature and Hold-up Time Profiles

机译:通过返回计算温度和保持时间轮廓来简便准确地计算编程温度气相色谱保留时间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Linear retention indices are commonly used to identify compounds in programmed-temperature gas chromatography (GC), but they are unreliable unless the original experimental conditions used to measure them are stringently reproduced. However, differences in many experimental conditions may be properly taken into account by calculating programmed-temperature retention times of compounds from their measured isothermal retention vs. temperature relationships. We call this approach “retention projection”. Until now, retention projection has been impractical because it required very precise, meticulous measurement of the temperature vs. time and hold-up time vs. temperature profiles actually produced by a specific GC instrument to be accurate. Here we present a new, easy-to-use methodology to precisely measure those profiles: We spike a sample with 25 n-alkanes and use their measured, programmed-temperature retention times to precisely back-calculate what the instrument profiles must have been. Then, when we use those back-calculated profiles to project retention times of 63 chemically diverse compounds, we found that the projections are extremely accurate (e.g. to ±0.9 s in a 40 min ramp). They remained accurate with different temperature programs, GC instruments, inlet pressures, flow rates, and with columns taken from different batches of stationary phase while the accuracy of retention indices became worse the more the experimental conditions were changed from the original ones used to measure them. We also developed new, open-source software () to demonstrate the system.
机译:线性保留指数通常用于在程序升温气相色谱(GC)中鉴定化合物,但除非严格复制用于测量它们的原始实验条件,否则它们不可靠。但是,可以通过根据化合物的等温保留度与温度之间的关系计算化合物的程序设定温度保留时间,来适当考虑许多实验条件下的差异。我们称这种方法为“保留预测”。到目前为止,保留投影还不切实际,因为它需要非常精确,细致的测量温度与时间的关系,以及保持时间与温度的曲线,而这些曲线是由特定的GC仪器实际产生的,以确保准确性。在这里,我们提供了一种新的,易于使用的方法来精确地测量那些分布图:我们将25种正构烷烃加标到样品中,并使用其测量的程序设定的温度保留时间来精确地反算出仪器的分布图。然后,当我们使用这些反向计算的分布图来预测63种化学上不同的化合物的保留时间时,我们发现预测值非常准确(例如在40分钟的时间内达到±0.9 s)。在不同的温度程序,GC仪器,进样口压力,流速以及从不同批次的固定相中分离得到的色谱柱中,它们的准确性仍然保持不变,而随着实验条件从用于测量它们的原始条件变化而来,保留指数的准确性变得越来越差。我们还开发了新的开源软件()来演示系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号