首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Trends in Gender Segregation in the Choice of Science and Engineering Majors
【2h】

Trends in Gender Segregation in the Choice of Science and Engineering Majors

机译:理工科专业选择中的性别隔离趋势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Numerous theories have been put forward for the high and continuing levels of gender segregation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, but research has not systematically examined the extent to which these theories for the gender gap are consistent with actual trends. Using both administrative data and four separate longitudinal studies sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), we evaluate several prominent explanations for the persisting gender gap in STEM fields related to mathematics performance and background and general life goals, and find that none of them are empirically satisfactory. Instead, we suggest that the structure of majors and their linkages to professional training and careers may combine with gender differences in educational goals to influence the persisting gender gap in STEM fields. An analysis of gendered career aspirations, course-taking patterns, and pathways to medical and law school supports this explanation.
机译:对于科学,技术,工程和数学(STEM)领域中的高度持续的性别隔离,已经提出了许多理论,但是研究尚未系统地检查这些性别差距理论在多大程度上与实际趋势相符。 。使用行政数据和美国教育部国家教育统计中心(NCES)赞助的四项单独的纵向研究,我们评估了STEM领域中与数学成绩,背景和一般生活目标相关的性别差距持续存在的几种重要解释,以及发现它们在经验上都不令人满意。相反,我们建议,专业结构及其与专业培训和职业的联系可能与教育目标中的性别差异相结合,从而影响STEM领域中持续存在的性别差距。对性别职业抱负,课程选择模式以及通往医学院和法学院的途径的分析支持了这种解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号