首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Causal Ordering of Prominence and Salience in Identity Theory: An Empirical Examination
【2h】

The Causal Ordering of Prominence and Salience in Identity Theory: An Empirical Examination

机译:认同理论中显着性和显着性的因果顺序:一项实证检验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Identity theory invokes two distinct but related concepts, identity salience and prominence, to explain how the organization of identities that make up the self impacts the probability that a given identity is situationally enacted. However, much extant research has failed to clearly distinguish between salience and prominence, and their empirical relationship has not been adequately investigated, impeding a solid understanding of the significance and role of each in a general theory of the self. This study examines their causal ordering using three waves of panel data from 48 universities focusing on respondents’ identities as science students. Analyses strongly support a causal ordering from prominence to salience. We provide theoretical and empirical grounds to justify this ordering while acknowledging potential variation in its strength across identities. Finally, we offer recommendations about the use of prominence and salience when measures of one or both are available or when analyses use cross-sectional data.
机译:身份理论援引两个不同但相关的概念,即身份显着性和突出性,以解释组成自我的身份的组织如何影响给定身份被情境化的可能性。然而,许多现存的研究未能清楚地区分显着性和突出性,并且它们的经验关系还没有得到充分的研究,这妨碍了人们对自我的一般理论中的意义和作用的牢固理解。这项研究使用来自48所大学的三波面板数据,考察了他们的因果顺序,重点关注受访者作为理科学生的身份。分析强烈支持从突出到显着的因果顺序。我们提供理论和经验依据,以证明这种排序的合理性,同时承认跨身份的强度可能存在差异。最后,当一项或两项措施可用或分析使用横截面数据时,我们提供有关突出和显着性使用的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号