首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Does Global Progress on Sanitation Really Lag behind Water? An Analysis of Global Progress on Community- and Household-Level Access to Safe Water and Sanitation
【2h】

Does Global Progress on Sanitation Really Lag behind Water? An Analysis of Global Progress on Community- and Household-Level Access to Safe Water and Sanitation

机译:全球卫生设施的进展真的落后于水吗?社区和家庭一级获得安全水和卫生设施的全球进展分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Safe drinking water and sanitation are important determinants of human health and wellbeing and have recently been declared human rights by the international community. Increased access to both were included in the Millennium Development Goals under a single dedicated target for 2015. This target was reached in 2010 for water but sanitation will fall short; however, there is an important difference in the benchmarks used for assessing global access. For drinking water the benchmark is community-level access whilst for sanitation it is household-level access, so a pit latrine shared between households does not count toward the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target. We estimated global progress for water and sanitation under two scenarios: with equivalent household- and community-level benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that the “sanitation deficit” is apparent only when household-level sanitation access is contrasted with community-level water access. When equivalent benchmarks are used for water and sanitation, the global deficit is as great for water as it is for sanitation, and sanitation progress in the MDG-period (1990–2015) outstrips that in water. As both drinking water and sanitation access yield greater benefits at the household-level than at the community-level, we conclude that any post–2015 goals should consider a household-level benchmark for both.
机译:安全的饮用水和卫生条件是人类健康和福祉的重要决定因素,国际社会最近已宣布其为人权。到2015年,在一项专门目标下,千年发展目标中包括了增加获得这两项服务的机会。2010年实现了水的这一目标,但卫生设施短缺;但是,用于评估全球访问的基准存在重大差异。对于饮用水,基准是社区级别的访问权限,而对于卫生设施,则是家庭级别的访问权限,因此,家庭之间共享的厕所不得计入千年发展目标(MDG)的目标。我们在以下两种情况下估算了全球水和卫生设施的进展:采用了等效的家庭和社区基准。我们的结果表明,只有在家庭一级的卫生设施获取与社区一级的水源获取形成对比的情况下,“卫生设施不足”才显而易见。如果将同等的基准用于水和卫生设施,那么全球的水赤字与卫生设施的赤字一样大,千年发展目标时期(1990-2015年)的卫生进展超过了水。由于饮用水和卫生设施的使用在家庭一级比在社区一级产生了更大的收益,因此我们得出结论,任何2015年后的目标都应考虑两者的家庭一级基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号