首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Can Reproductive Health Voucher Programs Improve Quality of Postnatal Care? A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Kenya’s Safe Motherhood Voucher Scheme
【2h】

Can Reproductive Health Voucher Programs Improve Quality of Postnatal Care? A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Kenya’s Safe Motherhood Voucher Scheme

机译:生殖健康券计划可以提高产后护理的质量吗?肯尼亚安全孕产券计划的准实验评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study tests the group-level causal relationship between the expansion of Kenya’s Safe Motherhood voucher program and changes in quality of postnatal care (PNC) provided at voucher-contracted facilities. We compare facilities accredited since program inception in 2006 (phase I) and facilities accredited since 2010-2011 (phase II) relative to comparable non-voucher facilities. PNC quality is assessed using observed clinical content processes, as well as client-reported outcome measures. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests are used to identify differences in mean process quality scores and client-reported outcome measures, comparing changes between intervention and comparison groups at the 2010 and 2012 data collection periods. Difference-in-differences analysis is used to estimate the reproductive health (RH) voucher program’s causal effect on quality of care by exploiting group-level differences between voucher-accredited and non-accredited facilities in 2010 and 2012. Participation in the voucher scheme since 2006 significantly improves overall quality of postnatal care by 39% (p=0.02), where quality is defined as the observable processes or components of service provision that occur during a PNC consultation. Program participation since phase I is estimated to improve the quality of observed maternal postnatal care by 86% (p=0.02), with the largest quality improvements in counseling on family planning methods (IRR 5.0; p=0.01) and return to fertility (IRR 2.6; p=0.01). Despite improvements in maternal aspects of PNC, we find a high proportion of mothers who seek PNC are not being checked by any provider after delivery. Additional strategies will be necessary to standardize provision of packaged postnatal interventions to both mother and newborn. This study addresses an important gap in the existing RH literature by using a strong evaluation design to assess RH voucher program effectiveness on quality improvement.
机译:这项研究测试了肯尼亚安全孕产计划的扩展与代孕机构提供的产后保健质量(PNC)的变化之间的群体级因果关系。我们比较了自2006年计划启动以来获得认可的设施(第一阶段)和自2010-2011年以来获得认可的设施(第二阶段)相对于可比较的非凭证设施。使用观察到的临床内容过程以及客户报告的结局指标评估PNC的质量。采用两尾不成对t检验来识别平均过程质量得分和客户报告的结果测量的差异,比较2010年和2012年数据收集期间干预组与对照组之间的变化。差异分析用于通过利用2010年和2012年通过凭单认可的设施和未经凭单认可的设施之间的团体级别差异来估计生殖健康凭单计划对护理质量的因果关系。 2006年将产后护理的总体质量显着提高了39%(p = 0.02),其中质量被定义为PNC咨询期间可观察的过程或提供服务的组成部分。据估计,自第一阶段以来的计划参与将使观察到的产妇产后护理质量提高86%(p = 0.02),其中计划生育方法咨询的质量改善最大(IRR 5.0; p = 0.01),并恢复生育能力(IRR) 2.6; p = 0.01)。尽管PNC的产妇方面有所改善,但我们发现,寻求PNC的母亲中有很大一部分在分娩后未得到任何提供者的检查。为了标准化向母亲和新生儿提供整套产后干预措施,将需要采取其他策略。这项研究通过使用强大的评估设计来评估RH凭证计划对提高质量的有效性,从而解决了现有RH文献中的一个重要空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号