首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluation of site-specific lateral inclusion zone for vapor intrusion based on an analytical approach
【2h】

Evaluation of site-specific lateral inclusion zone for vapor intrusion based on an analytical approach

机译:基于一种分析方法的特定区域横向包裹体带对蒸汽侵入的评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2002, U.S. EPA proposed a general buffer zone of approximately 100 feet (30 m) laterally to determine which buildings to include in vapor intrusion (VI) investigations. However, this screening distance can be threatened by factors such as extensive surface pavements. Under such circumstances, EPA recommended investigating soil vapor migration distance on a site-specific basis. To serve this purpose, we present an analytical model (AAMLPH) as an alternative to estimate lateral VI screening distances at chlorinated compound-contaminated sites. Based on a previously introduced model (AAML), AAMLPH is developed by considering the effects of impervious surface cover and soil geology heterogeneities, providing predictions consistent with the three-dimensional (3-D) numerical simulated results. By employing risk-based and contribution-based screening levels of subslab concentrations (50 and 500 µg/m3, respectively) and source-to-subslab attenuation factor (0.001 and 0.01, respectively), AAMLPH suggests that buildings greater than 30 m from a plume “boundary” can still be affected by VI in the presence of any two of the three factors, which are high source vapor concentration, shallow source and significant surface cover. This finding justifies the concern that EPA has expressed about the application of the 30 m lateral separation distance in the presence of physical barriers (e.g., asphalt covers or ice) at the ground surface.
机译:在2002年,美国EPA提出了一个侧向大约100英尺(30 m)的通用缓冲区,以确定将哪些建筑物包括在蒸汽入侵(VI)调查中。但是,该遮挡距离可能会受到诸如宽阔的人行道等因素的威胁。在这种情况下,EPA建议根据特定地点调查土壤蒸气迁移距离。为了达到这个目的,我们提出了一种分析模型(AAMLPH)作为替代方法,用于估计在被氯化化合物污染的地点的横向VI筛选距离。基于先前引入的模型(AAML),通过考虑不透水的表面覆盖和土壤地质异质性的影响来开发AAMLPH,从而提供与三维(3-D)数值模拟结果一致的预测。通过采用基于风险和基于贡献的亚平板浓度(分别为50和500 µg / m 3 )和源至亚平板衰减因子(分别为0.001和0.01)的筛选水平,AAMLPH建议在三个因素中的任何两个因素存在的情况下,距离羽“边界”大于30 m的建筑物仍会受到VI的影响,这三个因素是高源蒸汽浓度,浅源和显着的地表覆盖。这一发现证明了人们对EPA在地面上存在物理障碍物(例如沥青覆盖层或冰)时应用30 m的横向间隔距离的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号