首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Properties evaluation of silorane low-shrinkage non-flowable and flowable resin-based composites in dentistry
【2h】

Properties evaluation of silorane low-shrinkage non-flowable and flowable resin-based composites in dentistry

机译:牙科用硅氧烷低收缩率非流动性和流动性树脂基复合材料的性能评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose. This study tested the null hypothesis that different classes of direct restorative dental materials: silorane-based resin, low-shrinkage and conventional (non-flowable and flowable) resin-based composite (RBC) do not differ from each other with regard to polymerization shrinkage, depth of cure or microhardness.>Methods. 140 RBC samples were fabricated and tested by one calibrated operator. Polymerization shrinkage was measured using a gas pycnometer both before and immediately after curing with 36 J/cm2 light energy density. Depth of cure was determined, using a penetrometer and the Knoop microhardness was tested from the top surface to a depth of 5 mm.>Results. Considering polymerization shrinkage, the authors found significant differences (p < 0.05) between different materials: non-flowable RBCs showed lower values compared to flowable RBCs, with the silorane-based resin presenting the smallest shrinkage. The low shrinkage flowable composite performed similarly to non-flowable with significant statistical differences compared to the two other flowable RBCs. Regarding to depth of cure, low-shrinkage flowable RBC, were most effective compared to other groups. Microhardness was generally higher for the non-flowable vs. flowable RBCs (p < 0.05). However, the values for low-shrinkage flowable did not differ significantly from those of non-flowable, but were significantly higher than those of the other flowable RBCs.>Clinical Significance. RBCs have undergone many modifications as they have evolved and represent the most relevant restorative materials in today’s dental practice. This study of low-shrinkage RBCs, conventional RBCs (non-flowable and flowable) and silorane-based composite—by in vitro evaluation of volumetric shrinkage, depth of cure and microhardness—reveals that although filler content is an important determinant of polymerization shrinkage, it is not the only variable that affects properties of materials that were tested in this study.
机译:>目的。这项研究检验了零假设,即不同类别的直接修复牙齿材料:基于硅氧烷的树脂,低收缩率和常规的(不可流动和可流动的)树脂基复合材料(RBC)在聚合收缩率,固化深度或显微硬度方面各不相同。>方法。。由一名经过校准的操作人员制作并测试了140个RBC样品。在固化之前和之后立即用气体比重瓶测量聚合收缩率,光能密度为36 J / cm 2 。使用针入度计确定固化深度,并从顶面到5 mm的深度测试努氏显微硬度。>结果。考虑到聚合收缩率,作者发现两者之间存在显着差异(p <0.05)。不同的材料:不可流动的RBC与可流动的RBC相比显示出较低的值,其中基于硅氧烷的树脂收缩率最小。与其他两种可流动的RBC相比,低收缩率的可流动复合材料的性能与不可流动的相似,但统计差异明显。关于治疗深度,与其他组相比,低收缩率的可流动红细胞最为有效。不可流动的红细胞与可流动的红细胞的显微硬度通常较高(p <0.05)。然而,低收缩流动性的值与非流动性的值没有显着差异,但显着高于其他流动性的RBC。>临床意义。RBC经过了许多修改。进化并代表了当今牙科实践中最相关的修复材料。通过对体积收缩率,固化深度和显微硬度的体外评估,这项对低收缩率RBC,常规RBC(不可流动和可流动)和基于甲硅烷的复合材料的研究表明,尽管填料含量是聚合收缩率的重要决定因素,它不是影响本研究中所测试材料性能的唯一变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号