首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Ecosystem Service Valuation Assessments for Protected Area Management: A Case Study Comparing Methods Using Different Land Cover Classification and Valuation Approaches
【2h】

Ecosystem Service Valuation Assessments for Protected Area Management: A Case Study Comparing Methods Using Different Land Cover Classification and Valuation Approaches

机译:保护区管理的生态系统服务估价评估:采用不同土地覆被分类和估价方法的案例比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accurate and spatially-appropriate ecosystem service valuations are vital for decision-makers and land managers. Many approaches for estimating ecosystem service value (ESV) exist, but their appropriateness under specific conditions or logistical limitations is not uniform. The most accurate techniques are therefore not always adopted. Six different assessment approaches were used to estimate ESV for a National Nature Reserve in southwest China, across different management zones. These approaches incorporated two different land-use land cover (LULC) maps and development of three economic valuation techniques, using globally or locally-derived data. The differences in ESV across management zones for the six approaches were largely influenced by the classifications of forest and farmland and how they corresponded with valuation coefficients. With realistic limits on access to time, data, skills and resources, and using acquired estimates from globally-relevant sources, the Buffer zone was estimated as the most valuable (2.494 million ± 1.371 million CNY yr-1 km-2) and the Non-protected zone as the least valuable (770,000 ± 4,600 CNY yr-1 km-2). However, for both LULC maps, when using the locally-based and more time and skill-intensive valuation approaches, this pattern was generally reversed. This paper provides a detailed practical example of how ESV can differ widely depending on the availability and appropriateness of LULC maps and valuation approaches used, highlighting pitfalls for the managers of protected areas.
机译:准确且在空间上适当的生态系统服务评估对于决策者和土地管理者至关重要。存在许多估算生态系统服务价值(ESV)的方法,但是它们在特定条件或后勤限制下的适用性并不统一。因此,并非总是采用最准确的技术。六种不同的评估方法被用于评估中国西南部不同管理区的国家级自然保护区的ESV。这些方法结合了两个不同的土地利用土地覆盖(LULC)地图,并使用全球或本地数据,开发了三种经济评估技术。六种方法在不同管理区域的ESV差异在很大程度上受到森林和农田分类以及它们与评估系数的对应关系的影响。由于对访问时间,数据,技能和资源的实际限制,并使用从全球相关来源获得的估算值,缓冲区被认为是最有价值的(249.4万±137.1万元yr -1 km -2 )和非保护区的价值最低(770,000±4,600 CNY yr -1 km -2 )。但是,对于两个LULC地图,当使用基于本地的和更多的时间和技能密集的评估方法时,通常会逆转这种模式。本文提供了一个详细的实际示例,说明了ESV如何根据LULC地图的可用性和适当性以及所使用的评估方法而有很大不同,从而突出了保护区管理人员的陷阱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号