首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Predictive Value and Clinical Validation of the On-Track vs. Off-Track Concept in Bipolar Bone Loss in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
【2h】

Predictive Value and Clinical Validation of the On-Track vs. Off-Track Concept in Bipolar Bone Loss in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

机译:正轨与正轨概念在前盂唇肱骨不稳定性双极性骨丢失中的预测价值和临床验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives:Bone loss is a well-described risk factor for failure with arthroscopic stabilization. The isolated importance of bone loss on both the glenoid and humeral side has been increasingly studied. A more recent evolution considers how both the glenoid and humeral bone loss interact to determine whether their combination results in an “on-track” or “off-track” lesion, which may be more predictive of recurrent instability than looking at either side individually. While the biomechanics of this concept have been elucidated, no study has tested this theory in a clinical population. The purpose of this study is to compare a series of arthroscopic Bankart reconstructions stratified by whether they are “on-track” or “off-track” with regard to bipolar bone loss and to compare their rates of recurrence and functional outcome scores.
机译:目的:骨丢失是关节镜稳定失败的公认危险因素。越来越多地研究了关节盂和肱骨侧骨丢失的重要性。最近的一项进展是考虑关节盂和肱骨丢失如何相互作用,以确定它们的组合是导致“正轨”还是“离轨”病变,这可能比单独观察任一侧更能预测复发性不稳定。尽管已经阐明了该概念的生物力学,但尚无研究在临床人群中对该理论进行测试。这项研究的目的是比较一系列关节镜Bankart重建术,以双极型骨丢失为“正轨”或“正轨”进行分层,并比较其复发率和功能结局评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号