首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Macro-Particle Charcoal C Content following Prescribed Burning in a Mixed-Conifer Forest Sierra Nevada California
【2h】

Macro-Particle Charcoal C Content following Prescribed Burning in a Mixed-Conifer Forest Sierra Nevada California

机译:加利福尼亚内华达山脉的针叶树混交林中规定的燃烧后宏观颗粒碳的含量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fire suppression and changing climate have resulted in increased large wildfire frequency and severity in the western United States, causing carbon cycle impacts. Forest thinning and prescribed burning reduce high-severity fire risk, but require removal of biomass and emissions of carbon from burning. During each fire a fraction of the burning vegetation and soil organic matter is converted into charcoal, a relatively stable carbon form. We sought to quantify the effects of pre-fire fuel load and type on charcoal carbon produced by biomass combusted in a prescribed burn under different thinning treatments and to identify more easily measured predictors of charcoal carbon mass in a historically frequent-fire mixed-conifer forest. We hypothesized that charcoal carbon produced from coarse woody debris (CWD) during prescribed burning would be greater than that produced from fine woody debris (FWD). We visually quantified post-treatment charcoal carbon content in the O-horizon and the A-horizon beneath CWD (> 30 cm diameter) and up to 60 cm from CWD that was present prior to treatment. We found no difference in the size of charcoal carbon pools from CWD (treatment means ranged from 0.3–2.0 g m-2 of A-horizon and 0.0–1.7 g m-2 of O-horizon charcoal) and FWD (treatment means ranged from 0.2–1.7 g m-2 of A-horizon and 0.0–1.5 g m-2 of O-horizon charcoal). We also compared treatments and found that the burn-only, understory-thin and burn, and overstory-thin and burn treatments had significantly more charcoal carbon than the control. Charcoal carbon represented 0.29% of total ecosystem carbon. We found that char mass on CWD was an important predictor of charcoal carbon mass, but only explained 18–35% of the variation. Our results help improve our understanding of the effects forest restoration treatments have on ecosystem carbon by providing additional information about charcoal carbon content.
机译:灭火和气候变化导致美国西部大火的发生频率和严重性增加,从而造成碳循环影响。森林砍伐和规定的燃烧减少了高强度火灾的风险,但需要清除燃烧中的生物量和碳排放。在每次大火中,燃烧的植被和土壤有机物的一部分会转化为木炭(一种相对稳定的碳形式)。我们试图量化预燃燃料负载和类型对在不同稀疏处理下指定燃烧中燃烧的生物量所产生的木炭产生的木炭碳的影响,并确定更容易测量的在历史上频繁发生火灾的混合针叶林中木炭碳质量的预测因子。 。我们假设在规定的燃烧过程中,由粗木屑(CWD)产生的木炭碳将大于由细木屑(FWD)产生的木炭。我们以视觉方式量化了CWD(直径大于30厘米)以下和距CWD最多60厘米的O地平线和A地平线中处理后的碳含量。我们发现CWD的木炭碳库大小没有差异(处理方式为A-水平的0.3-2.0 gm -2 和0.0-1.7 gm -2 O-水平木炭)和FWD(处理方法为A-水平木的0.2-1.7 gm -2 和O-水平木的0.0-1.5 gm -2 )。我们还比较了处理,发现仅燃烧,薄层下燃烧和过薄,薄层处理的木炭碳含量明显高于对照。木炭碳占生态系统总碳的0.29%。我们发现CWD上的焦炭质量是木炭碳质量的重要预测指标,但只能解释18–35%的变化。我们的结果通过提供有关木炭碳含量的其他信息,有助于增进我们对森林恢复处理对生态系统碳的影响的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号