首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Can we respond mindfully to distressing voices? A systematic review of evidence for engagement acceptability effectiveness and mechanisms of change for mindfulness-based interventions for people distressed by hearing voices
【2h】

Can we respond mindfully to distressing voices? A systematic review of evidence for engagement acceptability effectiveness and mechanisms of change for mindfulness-based interventions for people distressed by hearing voices

机译:我们可以对令人痛苦的声音进行专心的回应吗?对正念干预针对听觉困扰的人们的参与可接受性有效性和变化机制的证据进行系统的审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Adapted mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) could be of benefit for people distressed by hearing voices. This paper presents a systematic review of studies exploring this possibility and we ask five questions: (1) Is trait mindfulness associated with reduced distress and disturbance in relation to hearing voices? (2) Are MBIs feasible for people distressed by hearing voices? (3) Are MBIs acceptable and safe for people distressed by hearing voices? (4) Are MBIs effective at reducing distress and disturbance in people distressed by hearing voices? (5) If effective, what are the mechanisms of change through which MBIs for distressing voices work? Fifteen studies were identified through a systematic search (n = 479). In relation to the five review questions: (1) data from cross-sectional studies showed an association between trait mindfulness and distress and disturbance in relation to hearing voices; (2) evidence from qualitative studies suggested that people distressed by hearing voices could engage meaningfully in mindfulness practice; (3) MBIs were seen as acceptable and safe; (4) there were no adequately powered RCTs allowing conclusions about effectiveness to be drawn; and (5) it was not possible to draw on robust empirical data to comment on potential mechanisms of change although findings from the qualitative studies identified three potential change processes; (i) reorientation of attention; (ii) decentring; and (iii) acceptance of voices. This review provided evidence that MBIs are engaging, acceptable, and safe. Evidence for effectiveness in reducing distress and disturbance is lacking however. We call for funding for adequately powered RCTs that will allow questions of effectiveness, maintenance of effects, mechanisms of change and moderators of outcome to be definitively addressed.
机译:适应性正念为基础的干预措施(MBI)可能会对因听到声音而困扰的人们有所帮助。本文对探索这种可能性的研究进行了系统的综述,并提出了五个问题:(1)特质正念与与听觉声音有关的困扰和困扰减少有关吗? (2)MBI是否适用于因听到声音而困扰的人? (3)MBI是否适合因听到声音而困扰的人? (4)MBI是否能有效减少因听到声音而困扰的人的困扰和困扰? (5)如果有效,MBI令人沮丧的声音通过什么变化机制起作用?通过系统搜索确定了15项研究(n = 479)。关于五个复习问题:(1)横断面研究的数据表明,特质正念与与听觉声音有关的困扰和困扰之间存在关联; (2)定性研究的证据表明,因听到声音而困扰的人可以有意义地参与正念练习; (3)MBI被认为是可接受和安全的; (4)没有足够的能力进行随机对照试验,可以得出有关有效性的结论; (5)尽管定性研究的发现确定了三个潜在的变化过程,但无法利用可靠的经验数据来评论潜在的变化机制。 (i)重新调整注意力; (ii)分权; (iii)接受声音。这项审查提供了MBI吸引人,可接受和安全的证据。但是,缺乏有效减少痛苦和干扰的证据。我们呼吁为足够有能力的RCT筹集资金,这将使有效性,效果维持,变化机制和结果调节者等问题得到明确解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号