首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >What Role for Law Human Rights and Bioethics in an Age of Big Data Consortia Science and Consortia Ethics? The Importance of Trustworthiness
【2h】

What Role for Law Human Rights and Bioethics in an Age of Big Data Consortia Science and Consortia Ethics? The Importance of Trustworthiness

机译:在大数据财团科学和财团伦理时代法律人权和生物伦理起什么作用?诚信的重要性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The global bioeconomy is generating new paradigm-shifting practices of knowledge co-production, such as collective innovation; large-scale, data-driven global consortia science (Big Science); and consortia ethics (Big Ethics). These bioeconomic and sociotechnical practices can be forces for progressive social change, but they can also raise predicaments at the interface of law, human rights, and bioethics. In this article, we examine one such double-edged practice: the growing, multivariate exploitation of Big Data in the health sector, particularly by the private sector. Commercial exploitation of health data for knowledge-based products is a key aspect of the bioeconomy and is also a topic of concern among publics around the world. It is exacerbated in the current age of globally interconnected consortia science and consortia ethics, which is characterized by accumulating epistemic proximity, diminished academic independence, “extreme centrism”, and conflicted/competing interests among innovation actors. Extreme centrism is of particular importance as a new ideology emerging from consortia science and consortia ethics; this relates to invariably taking a middle-of-the-road populist stance, even in the event of human rights breaches, so as to sustain the populist support needed for consortia building and collective innovation. What role do law, human rights, and bioethics—separate and together—have to play in addressing these predicaments and opportunities in early 21st century science and society? One answer we propose is an intertwined ethico-legal normative construct, namely trustworthiness. By considering trustworthiness as a central pillar at the intersection of law, human rights, and bioethics, we enable others to trust us, which in turns allows different actors (both nonprofit and for-profit) to operate more justly in consortia science and ethics, as well as to access and responsibly use health data for public benefit.
机译:全球生物经济正在产生知识联合生产的新范式转变实践,例如集体创新;大规模的,数据驱动的全球财团科学(Big Science);和财团伦理(大伦理)。这些生物经济和社会技术实践可以成为推动社会变革的力量,但它们也可能在法律,人权和生物伦理学的交汇中引发困境。在本文中,我们研究了一种这样的双重实践:在卫生部门,尤其是私营部门,对大数据的不断增长的多变量利用。商业开发基于知识的产品的健康数据是生物经济的一个关键方面,也是全世界公众关注的话题。在当今全球相互关联的联合体科学和联合体伦理的时代,这种情况更加恶化,其特征是积累了认识上的接近性,学术独立性下降,“极端中心主义”以及创新参与者之间利益冲突/竞争。极端中心主义作为从联合体科学和联合体伦理学涌现的新意识形态特别重要。这甚至涉及在违反人权的情况下始终采取中间路线的民粹主义立场,以维持建立财团和集体创新所需的民粹主义支持。在解决21世纪初科学和社会中的这些困境和机遇时,法律,人权和生物伦理分别和共同发挥着怎样的作用?我们提出的一个答案是交织在一起的伦理法律规范结构,即信任度。通过将诚信视为法律,人权和生物伦理学交汇处的中心支柱,我们使其他人能够信任我们,这又使不同的参与者(非营利组织和营利组织)在财团科学和道德操守中更加公正地运作,以及为公共利益访问和负责任地使用健康数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号