首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of a wipe method with and without a rinse to recover wall losses in closed face 37-mm cassettes used for sampling lead dust particulates
【2h】

Comparison of a wipe method with and without a rinse to recover wall losses in closed face 37-mm cassettes used for sampling lead dust particulates

机译:比较使用和不使用冲洗液来回收壁面损失的擦拭方法的效果该壁面用于采样铅尘粒的封闭式37毫米盒

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Closed-face 37-millimeter (mm) polystyrene cassettes are often used for exposure monitoring of metal particulates. Several methods have been proposed to account for the wall loss in air sampling cassettes, including rinsing, wiping, within-cassette dissolution, and an internal capsule fused to the filter that could be digested with the filter. Until internal capsules replace filters, other methods for assessing wall losses may be considered. To determine if rinsing and wiping or wiping alone is adequate to determine wall losses on cassettes, we collected 54 full-shift area air samples at a battery recycling facility. We collected six replicate samples at three locations within the facility for 3 consecutive days. The wall losses of three replicate cassettes from each day-location were analyzed following a rinse and two consecutive wipes. The wall losses of the other three replicates from each day-location were analyzed following two consecutive wipes only. Mixed-cellulose ester membrane filter, rinse, and wipes were analyzed separately following NIOSH Method 7303. We found an average of 29% (range: 8%–54%) recovered lead from the cassette walls for all samples. We also found that rinsing prior to wiping the interior cassette walls did not substantially improve recovery of wall losses compared to wiping alone. A rinse plus one wipe recovered on average 23% (range: 13%–33%) of the lead, while one wipe alone recovered on average 21% (range: 16%–22%). Similarly we determined that a second wipe did not provide substantial additional recovery of lead (average: 4%, range: 0.4%–19%) compared to the first wipe disregarding the rinse (average: 18%, range: 4%–39%). We concluded that when an internal capsule is not used, wall losses of lead dust in air sampling cassettes can be adequately recovered by wiping the internal wall surfaces of the cassette with a single wipe.
机译:封闭式37毫米(mm)聚苯乙烯暗盒通常用于金属微粒的暴露监测。已经提出了几种方法来考虑空气采样盒中的壁损失,包括冲洗,擦拭,盒内溶解以及与过滤器融合的内部胶囊,该内部胶囊可以被过滤器消化。在内部胶囊更换过滤器之前,可以考虑使用其他评估壁损的方法。为了确定清洗和擦拭还是单独擦拭是否足以确定盒式磁带上的壁损,我们在电池回收设施中收集了54个全班区域的空气样本。我们连续三天在设施内的三个位置收集了六个重复样本。在冲洗和连续两次擦拭之后,分析了每天重复放置的三个复制盒的壁面损失。仅在连续两次擦拭之后,分析每天放置的其他三个重复样品的壁面损失。按照NIOSH方法7303分别分析了混合纤维素酯膜过滤器,冲洗液和抹布。对于所有样品,我们从盒壁中平均回收了29%(范围:8%–54%)的铅。我们还发现,与单独擦拭相比,在擦拭内部暗盒壁之前进行漂洗并不能显着改善壁损的恢复。漂洗液和一根湿巾的平均铅含量为23%(范围:13%–33%),而仅一根湿巾的平均含量为21%(范围:16%–22%)。同样,我们确定,与不考虑漂洗的第一次擦拭布(平均:18%,范围:4%–39%)相比,第二擦拭布没有提供大量的铅附加回收(平均:4%,范围:0.4%–19%)。 )。我们得出的结论是,当不使用内胆时,可以通过一次擦拭擦拭采样盒的内壁表面来充分弥补空气采样盒中铅尘的壁面损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号