首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Conservation Planning for Offsetting the Impacts of Development: A Case Study of Biodiversity and Renewable Energy in the Mojave Desert
【2h】

Conservation Planning for Offsetting the Impacts of Development: A Case Study of Biodiversity and Renewable Energy in the Mojave Desert

机译:抵消发展影响的保护规划:以莫哈韦沙漠中的生物多样性和可再生能源为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Balancing society’s competing needs of development and conservation requires careful consideration of tradeoffs. Renewable energy development and biodiversity conservation are often considered beneficial environmental goals. The direct footprint and disturbance of renewable energy, however, can displace species’ habitat and negatively impact populations and natural communities if sited without ecological consideration. Offsets have emerged as a potentially useful tool to mitigate residual impacts after trying to avoid, minimize, or restore affected sites. Yet the problem of efficiently designing a set of offset sites becomes increasingly complex where many species or many sites are involved. Spatial conservation prioritization tools are designed to handle this problem, but have seen little application to offset siting and analysis. To address this need we designed an offset siting support tool for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) of California, and present a case study of hypothetical impacts from solar development in the Western Mojave subsection. We compare two offset scenarios designed to mitigate a hypothetical 15,331 ha derived from proposed utility-scale solar energy development (USSED) projects. The first scenario prioritizes offsets based precisely on impacted features, while the second scenario offsets impacts to maximize biodiversity conservation gains in the region. The two methods only agree on 28% of their prioritized sites and differ in meeting species-specific offset goals. Differences between the two scenarios highlight the importance of clearly specifying choices and priorities for offset siting and mitigation in general. Similarly, the effects of background climate and land use change may lessen the durability or effectiveness of offsets if not considered. Our offset siting support tool was designed specifically for the DRECP area, but with minor code modification could work well in other offset analyses, and could provide continuing support for a potentially innovative mitigation solution to environmental impacts.
机译:要平衡社会在发展和保护方面的竞争需求,就需要仔细权衡取舍。可再生能源开发和生物多样性保护通常被认为是有益的环境目标。但是,如果放置地点没有生态考虑,直接的足迹和可再生能源的干扰会取代物种的栖息地,并对种群和自然群落产生负面影响。在尝试避开,最小化或恢复受影响的站点之后,偏移已成为缓解残留影响的潜在有用工具。然而,在涉及许多物种或许多站点的情况下,有效设计一组偏移站点的问题变得越来越复杂。空间保留优先级排序工具旨在解决此问题,但几乎没有应用来抵消选址和分析。为了满足这一需求,我们为加利福尼亚的沙漠可再生能源保护计划(DRECP)设计了偏移量选址支持工具,并提供了一个案例研究,该案例研究了西莫哈韦沙漠地区太阳能开发产生的假设影响。我们比较了两种抵消方案,这些方案旨在缓解从拟议的公用事业规模太阳能开发(USSED)项目得出的假设的15331公顷。第一种方案精确地根据受影响的要素来确定补偿的优先级,而第二种方案则抵消影响以使该地区的生物多样性保护收益最大化。两种方法仅在其优先位置的28%上达成一致,并且在满足特定于物种的补偿目标方面有所不同。两种情况之间的差异凸显了总体上明确规定抵消位置和缓解措施的选择和优先级的重要性。同样,如果不考虑背景气候和土地利用变化的影响,可能会抵消补偿的持久性或有效性。我们的偏移量选址支持工具是专为DRECP区域设计的,但只需稍作修改即可在其他偏移量分析中很好地工作,并且可以为潜在的创新性缓解方案提供持续的支持,以解决环境影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号