首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Content Coding of Psychotherapy Transcripts Using Labeled TopicModels
【2h】

Content Coding of Psychotherapy Transcripts Using Labeled TopicModels

机译:使用标记主题的心理治疗成绩单的内容编码楷模

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Psychotherapy represents a broad class of medical interventions received by millions of patients each year. Unlike most medical treatments, its primary mechanisms are linguistic; i.e., the treatment relies directly on a conversation between a patient and provider. However, the evaluation of patient-provider conversation suffers from critical shortcomings, including intensive labor requirements, coder error, non-standardized coding systems, and inability to scale up to larger data sets. To overcome these shortcomings, psychotherapy analysis needs a reliable and scalable method for summarizing the content of treatment encounters. We used a publicly-available psychotherapy corpus from Alexander Street press comprising a large collection of transcripts of patient-provider conversations to compare coding performance for two machine learning methods. We used the Labeled Latent Dirichlet Allocation (L-LDA) model to learn associations between text and codes, to predict codes in psychotherapy sessions, and to localize specific passages of within-session text representative of a session code. We compared the L-LDA model to a baseline lasso regression model using predictive accuracy and model generalizability (measured by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) from the receiveroperating characteristic (ROC) curve). The L-LDA model outperforms the lassologistic regression model at predicting session-level codes with average AUCscores of .79, and .70, respectively. For fine-grained level coding, L-LDA andlogistic regression are able to identify specific talk-turns representative ofsymptom codes. However, model performance for talk-turn identification is notyet as reliable as human coders. We conclude that the L-LDA model has thepotential to be an objective, scaleable method for accurate automated coding ofpsychotherapy sessions that performs better than comparable discriminativemethods at session-level coding and can also predict fine-grained codes.
机译:心理疗法代表了每年数百万患者接受的一类广泛的医学干预措施。与大多数药物不同,其主要机制是语言学。即,治疗直接取决于患者和提供者之间的对话。但是,对患者与提供者之间的对话的评估存在严重的缺陷,包括大量的劳动力需求,编码错误,非标准化的编码系统以及无法扩展到更大的数据集。为了克服这些缺点,心理治疗分析需要一种可靠且可扩展的方法来总结治疗经历的内容。我们使用了来自亚历山大街出版社的公开可用的心理疗法语料库,该语料库包含大量患者-提供者对话的笔录,以比较两种机器学习方法的编码性能。我们使用标签潜在狄利克雷分配(L-LDA)模型来学习文本和代码之间的关联,以预测心理治疗会话中的代码,并定位代表会话代码的会话内文本的特定段落。我们将L-LDA模型与基线套索回归模型进行了比较,使用的是预测准确性和模型一般性(通过计算接收者的曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量)操作特性(ROC)曲线)。 L-LDA模型优于套索使用平均AUC预测会话级代码的逻辑回归模型分别为.79和.70。对于细粒度的级别编码,L-LDA和Logistic回归能够识别代表症状代码。但是,语音识别的模型性能不是但与人类编码员一样可靠。我们得出结论,L-LDA模型具有可能是一种客观,可扩展的方法,可以对心理治疗课程的表现优于同类判别法会话级编码的方法,还可以预测细粒度的代码。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号