首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Retrospective Observational Study Examining the Effect of Thoracic Epidural and Patient Controlled Analgesia on Short-term Outcomes in Blunt Thoracic Trauma Injuries
【2h】

A Retrospective Observational Study Examining the Effect of Thoracic Epidural and Patient Controlled Analgesia on Short-term Outcomes in Blunt Thoracic Trauma Injuries

机译:回顾性观察研究检查硬膜外硬膜外和患者自控镇痛对钝性胸外伤短期结果的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Effective analgesia in the early stages after any major traumatic event remains pivotal to optimal trauma management. For patients with significant thoracic injuries, this is paramount to ensure ongoing efficient respiratory function. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of analgesic modes in the management of patients with a primary thoracic injury and blunt mechanism of injury. By understanding variables that influence the use of varying analgesic modes and influence the development of pulmonary complications, there should be more uniform evidence-based prescription in the future.This retrospective study considered analgesic use in patients admitted after blunt thoracic injuries at one major trauma center over a 2-year period. Pulmonary complications measured included both infective and ventilator-associated failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify patient and injury severity characteristics and their association with respiratory complications.A total of 401 cases were reviewed and analyzed: 159 received Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA), 32 received PCA and epidural analgesia (EA), 6 received EA alone, and 204 received interval-administered analgesia. There were no significant differences in the rates of complication when compared between analgesic modes. Patients who developed pneumonia had significantly increased number of thoracic fractures and underlying organ injury (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis highlighted duration of intercostal drain insertion (OR 1.377, P = 0.001) and premorbid cardiac disease (OR 2.624, P = 0.042) and ICU length of stay (OR: 1.146, P < 0.001) as significant predictors of developing pneumonia in this patient group.Examining the different analgesic modes, this study failed to identify a particular analgesic mode that was more effective in preventing pulmonary complications in blunt thoracic injuries. However, variables that may influence usage of different analgesic modes and high-risk groups for the development of pneumonia were identified. Further work is warranted to consider the long-term benefits of analgesia in patients post-blunt thoracic injuries.
机译:任何重大创伤事件发生后的早期有效镇痛仍然是最佳创伤处理的关键。对于严重的胸外伤患者,这对于确保持续有效的呼吸功能至关重要。这项研究的目的是研究镇痛方法在治疗原发性胸外伤和钝性损伤中的应用。通过了解影响使用不同镇痛方式并影响肺部并发症发展的变量,将来应该有更统一的循证处方。这项回顾性研究考虑了在一个主要创伤中心对钝性胸腔受伤后入院的患者使用镇痛药的情况。在2年的时间内。测量的肺部并发症包括感染性和呼吸机相关性衰竭。使用单因素和多因素分析来确定患者和损伤的严重程度特征及其与呼吸系统并发症的关系。共审查和分析了401例病例:159例接受了患者自控镇痛(PCA),32例接受了PCA和硬膜外镇痛(EA),6单独接受EA,204例接受间隔镇痛。与止痛药相比,并发症发生率无显着差异。发生肺炎的患者的胸骨骨折数量和潜在的器官损伤明显增加(P <0.05)。 Logistic回归分析强调肋间引流插入的持续时间(OR 1.377,P = 0.001)和病前心脏病(OR 2.624,P = 0.042)和ICU住院时间(OR:1.146,P <0.001)是发生肺炎的重要预测指标。在研究不同的镇痛方式时,该研究未能确定一种特定的镇痛方式,该方式在预防钝性胸椎损伤中的肺部并发症方面更有效。但是,确定了可能影响使用不同的镇痛模式和高危人群而导致肺炎的变量。有必要做进一步的工作,以考虑钝性胸廓损伤后患者的镇痛作用的长期益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号