首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech
【2h】

Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech

机译:探索需求思维的生态有效性:自发与自发发生内在言语的神经相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Psychology and cognitive neuroscience often use standardized tasks to elicit particular experiences. We explore whether elicited experiences are similar to spontaneous experiences. In an MRI scanner, five participants performed tasks designed to elicit inner speech (covertly repeating experimenter-supplied words), inner seeing, inner hearing, feeling, and sensing. Then, in their natural environments, participants were trained in four days of random-beep-triggered Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES). They subsequently returned to the scanner for nine 25-min resting-state sessions; during each they received four DES beeps and described those moments (9 × 4 = 36 moments per participant) of spontaneously occurring experience. Enough of those moments included spontaneous inner speech to allow us to compare brain activation during spontaneous inner speech with what we had found in task-elicited inner speech. ROI analysis was used to compare activation in two relevant areas (Heschl’s gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus). Task-elicited inner speech was associated with decreased activation in Heschl’s gyrus and increased activation in left inferior frontal gyrus. However, spontaneous inner speech had the opposite effect in Heschl’s gyrus and no significant effect in left inferior frontal gyrus. This study demonstrates how spontaneous phenomena can be investigated in MRI and calls into question the assumption that task-created phenomena are often neurophysiologically and psychologically similar to spontaneously occurring phenomena.
机译:心理学和认知神经科学经常使用标准化的任务来激发特定的经验。我们探索引发的经验是否类似于自发的经验。在MRI扫描仪中,五名参与者执行了旨在引起内在语音(明显重复实验者提供的单词),内在视觉,内在听力,感觉和感觉的任务。然后,在自然环境中,对参与者进行为期四天的随机蜂鸣式描述性体验抽样(DES)培训。随后,他们回到扫描仪,进行了9个25分钟的休息状态会议。在每个过程中,他们收到了四声DES哔声,并描述了自发发生的那些瞬间(每个参与者9×4 = 36瞬间)。这些时刻中包括自发的内部语音,使我们可以将自发内部语音期间的大脑激活与任务引起的内部语音中的大脑激活进行比较。投资回报率分析用于比较两个相关区域(赫斯基的回和左下额回)的激活情况。任务引起的内在语音与Heschl回旋的激活减少和左下额回的激活增加有关。但是,自发的内在言语对赫施尔回的影响相反,对左下额回没有明显的影响。这项研究证明了如何在MRI中研究自发现象,并质疑任务创建的现象在神经生理和心理上通常与自发现象相似的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号