首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Disorganized Attachment and Personality Functioning in Adults: A Latent Class Analysis
【2h】

Disorganized Attachment and Personality Functioning in Adults: A Latent Class Analysis

机译:成人杂乱无章的依恋和人格功能:潜在类别分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Though researchers have attended to disorganized attachment in infants and children, they have infrequently focused on the character of disorganized attachment in adults. In this study, we aimed to identify clusters of participants based on attachment levels and styles, seeking to better delineate severity and stylistic differences in disorganized attachment than has been previously articulated. We used a new assessment approach focused on a hierarchy of attachment organization, including secure, insecure (dismissive and preoccupied), rigid-controlling (hostile control and compulsive caregiving) and disorganized (contradictory, impoverished and unresolved) levels of attachment. Clinical evaluators used information from diagnostic and attachment-based interviews to rate participants on each of these aspects of attachment. Latent class analysis revealed a 4-class solution, including a secure (n = 33), insecure (n = 110) and two disorganized classes. One disorganized class (disorganized-oscillating) was characterized by elevations on contradictory and preoccupied styles (n = 77) and another (disorganized-impoverished) showed elevations on impoverished and dismissive styles (n = 53). The disorganized-oscillating class exhibited elevated PD severity and general symptom severity, BPD, histrionic and antisocial dimensional scores, and the most severe identity disturbance compared to the other classes. The impoverished-dismissive class exhibited the highest avoidant and schizoid PD dimensional scores of the classes, and higher PD severity compared to the insecure and secure classes. These results highlight the possibility of identifying distinct classes of attachment organization, differentiated both by aspects of severity and interpersonal style. They also shed light on the manifestation of attachment disorganization in adults.
机译:尽管研究人员研究了婴儿和儿童的无序依恋,但他们很少关注成年人的无序依恋特征。在这项研究中,我们旨在根据依恋程度和风格来识别参与者群体,力图更好地描述混乱和依恋的严重性和风格差异。我们使用了一种新的评估方法,该方法侧重于依恋组织的层次结构,包括安全,不安全(轻蔑和专心致志),严格控制(敌对控制和强迫照料)和无组织(依存,矛盾,贫困和未解决)的依恋级别。临床评估人员使用来自诊断和基于依恋的访谈中的信息对参与者在依恋的各个方面进行评分。潜在类分析显示了4类解决方案,包括安全(n = 33),不安全(n = 110)和两个杂乱无章的类。一类杂乱无章的类别(无组织振荡)的特征是矛盾和专心的风格的提升(n = 77),另一类(杂乱无章的)显示的是贫困和轻蔑的风格的提升(n = 53)。与其他班级相比,无序的摆动班级表现出更高的PD严重性和一般症状严重性,BPD,组织和反社会维度得分,以及最严重的身份障碍。与不安全和安全的班级相比,贫困轻视的班级表现出最高的避免和类风湿性关节炎维度得分,并且PD严重性更高。这些结果凸显了识别依恋组织的不同类别的可能性,依严重性和人际交往方式而有所区别。他们还阐明了成年人依恋杂乱的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号