首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Combined With Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma
【2h】

Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Combined With Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

机译:干扰素联合达卡巴嗪与单独达卡巴嗪联合治疗皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的安全性和有效性的Meta分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN) combined with dacarbazine (DTIC) (experimental group) versus DTIC alone (control group) in cutaneous malignant melanoma.After searching all available databases, eligible articles were identified and subjected to quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3; combined relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for survival rates, response rates, and adverse events.Eight randomized controlled trials published between 1990 and 2014 involving 795 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with DTIC alone, IFN combined with DTIC significantly increased the overall response rate (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.21–2.08, P = 0.0008),the complete response rate (RR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.89–5.76, P < 0.0001), 2-year survival (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.99–2.54, P = 0.050) grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity (RR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.32–4.02, P = 0.003), neurotoxicity (RR = 18.15, 95% CI 5.34–61.74, P < 0.00001), and flu-like symptoms (RR = 6.31, 95% CI 1.95–20.39, P = 0.002). The partial response rate, grade ≥3 nausea and vomiting, treatment-related, and 1- and 3-year survival were not significantly different between IFN combined with DTIC and DTIC alone.IFN combined with DTIC may moderately improve the complete response rate, but increases the incidence of adverse events and has no significant effect on 1- and 3-year survival in cutaneous malignant melanoma.
机译:本研究的目的是比较干扰素(IFN)联合达卡巴嗪(DTIC)(实验组)与仅DTIC(对照组)在皮肤恶性黑色素瘤中的疗效和安全性。接受质量评估。使用RevMan 5.3进行荟萃分析;合并生存率,缓解率和不良事件的相对危险度(RR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)进行了计算。荟萃分析包括1990年至2014年间发表的涉及795名患者的八项随机对照试验。与单独的DTIC相比,IFN联合DTIC显着提高了总缓解率(RR = 1.59,95%CI 1.21–2.08,P = 0.0008),完全缓解率(RR = 3.30,95%CI 1.89–5.76,P < 0.0001),2年生存率(RR = 1.59,95%CI 0.99–2.54,P = 0.050)≥3级血液学毒性(RR = 2.30,95%CI 1.32–4.02,P = 0.003),神经毒性(RR = 18.15) ,95%CI 5.34–61.74,P <0.00001)和类似流感的症状(RR = 6.31,95%CI 1.95-20.39,P = 0.002)。干扰素联合DTIC和单独DTIC的部分缓解率,≥3级恶心和呕吐,治疗相关性以及1年和3年生存率无显着差异.IFN联合DTIC可能会适度提高总缓解率,但会增加不良事件的发生率,并且对皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的1年和3年生存率没有明显影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号