首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Utilization Probability Map for Migrating Bald Eagles in Northeastern North America: A Tool for Siting Wind Energy Facilities and Other Flight Hazards
【2h】

Utilization Probability Map for Migrating Bald Eagles in Northeastern North America: A Tool for Siting Wind Energy Facilities and Other Flight Hazards

机译:北美东北部迁徙白头鹰的利用概率图:一种选址风能设施和其他飞行危险的工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Collisions with anthropogenic structures are a significant and well documented source of mortality for avian species worldwide. The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is known to be vulnerable to collision with wind turbines and federal wind energy guidelines include an eagle risk assessment for new projects. To address the need for risk assessment, in this study, we 1) identified areas of northeastern North America utilized by migrating bald eagles, and 2) compared these with high wind-potential areas to identify potential risk of bald eagle collision with wind turbines. We captured and marked 17 resident and migrant bald eagles in the northern Chesapeake Bay between August 2007 and May 2009. We produced utilization distribution (UD) surfaces for 132 individual migration tracks using a dynamic Brownian bridge movement model and combined these to create a population wide UD surface with a 1 km cell size. We found eagle migration movements were concentrated within two main corridors along the Appalachian Mountains and the Atlantic Coast. Of the 3,123 wind turbines ≥100 m in height in the study area, 38% were located in UD 20, and 31% in UD 40. In the United States portion of the study area, commercially viable wind power classes overlapped with only 2% of the UD category 20 (i.e., the areas of highest use by migrating eagles) and 4% of UD category 40. This is encouraging because it suggests that wind energy development can still occur in the study area at sites that are most viable from a wind power perspective and are unlikely to cause significant mortality of migrating eagles. In siting new turbines, wind energy developers should avoid the high-use migration corridors (UD categories 20 & 40) and focus new wind energy projects on lower-risk areas (UD categories 60–100).
机译:与人为结构的碰撞是全世界鸟类的重要且有据可查的死亡原因。众所周知,白头鹰(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)容易与风力涡轮机发生碰撞,联邦风能指南还包括对新项目进行鹰头风险评估。为了满足风险评估的需要,在本研究中,我们1)确定了迁徙秃鹰所利用的北美东北部地区,以及2)将这些区域与高风势区域进行了比较,以识别与风力涡轮机相撞的秃鹰的潜在风险。在2007年8月至2009年5月之间,我们在北部切塞皮克湾捕获并标记了17只居民和迁徙的秃头鹰。我们使用动态的布朗桥运动模型为132个单独的迁徙轨迹制作了利用率分布(UD)面,并将它们组合在一起,形成了整个种群UD表面的像元大小为1 km。我们发现老鹰的迁徙运动集中在阿巴拉契亚山脉和大西洋沿岸的两个主要走廊内。在研究区域中,高度≥100 m的3,123台风力涡轮机中,有38%位于UD 20,而有31%位于UD40。在研究区域的美国部分,具有商业可行性的风力等级仅重叠2% UD类20(即老鹰迁徙使用最多的地区)和UD类40中的4%。这令人鼓舞,因为它表明风能开发仍可在研究区域中最可行的地点进行。从风力发电的角度来看,这不太可能导致迁徙老鹰的大量死亡。在为新的涡轮机选址时,风能开发商应避免使用高迁移率的走廊(UD类别20和40),而将新的风能项目重点放在低风险地区(UD类别60-100)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号