首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Facing a Clever Predator Demands Clever Responses - Red-Backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica)
【2h】

Facing a Clever Predator Demands Clever Responses - Red-Backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica)

机译:面对聪明的捕食者需要聪明的回应-红背rik鸟(Lanius collurio)与欧亚喜pies(Pica pica)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) behave quite differently towards two common nest predators. While the European jay (Garrulus glandarius) is commonly attacked, in the presence of the Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), shrikes stay fully passive. We tested the hypotheses that this passive response to the magpie is an alternative defense strategy. Nesting shrikes were exposed to the commonly attacked European kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in a situation in which i) a harmless domestic pigeon, ii) a commonly attacked European jay, and iii) a non-attacked black-billed magpie are (separately) presented nearby. The kestrel dummy presented together with the magpie dummy was attacked with a significantly lower intensity than when it was presented with the other intruders (pigeon, jay) or alone. This means that the presence of the magpie inhibited the shrike’s defense response towards the other intruder. These results support our previous hypotheses that shrikes use an alternative defense strategy in the magpie’s presence. We hypothesize that the magpie is able to associate the active defense of the shrikes with the close proximity of a nest and that shrikes try not to draw the magpie’s attention to the nest. The reason why this strategy is not used against the jay remains unanswered as jays as well as magpies show very similar cognitive and foraging skills enabling them to individuate the nest presence according to active parental defense.
机译:红背sh(Lanius collurio)对两种常见的巢捕食者的行为有很大不同。尽管欧洲周杰伦(Garrulus glandarius)经常受到袭击,但在欧亚喜(Pica pica)的存在下,sh雀鱼仍然完全处于被动状态。我们检验了以下假设,即对喜this的这种被动反应是另一种防御策略。在以下情况下(以下情况)展示筑巢sh鳞片:附近。与与其他入侵者(鸽子,周杰伦)一起出现时,与est类动物一起出现的茶est模型受到的攻击强度要低得多。这意味着喜的存在抑制了伯劳鸟对其他入侵者的防御反应。这些结果支持了我们先前的假设,即sh子在s存在时会使用其他防御策略。我们假设喜the能够将shrikes的主动防御与巢的近距离联系起来,而shrikes尽量不要将喜p吸引到巢中。不采用这种策略来对付周杰伦的原因仍未得到回答,因为周杰伦和喜pies表现出非常相似的认知和觅食技能,从而使它们能够根据活跃的父母防御来区分巢中的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号