首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae Ascomycota)
【2h】

Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae Ascomycota)

机译:基于系统发育分析的物种划界限制:以低催眠的hypertrypa组(ParmeliaceaeAscomycota)为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Delimiting species boundaries among closely related lineages often requires a range of independent data sets and analytical approaches. Similar to other organismal groups, robust species circumscriptions in fungi are increasingly investigated within an empirical framework. Here we attempt to delimit species boundaries in a closely related clade of lichen-forming fungi endemic to Asia, the Hypogymnia hypotrypa group (Parmeliaceae). In the current classification, the Hypogymnia hypotrypa group includes two species: H. hypotrypa and H. flavida, which are separated based on distinctive reproductive modes, the former producing soredia but absent in the latter. We reexamined the relationship between these two species using phenotypic characters and molecular sequence data (ITS, GPD, and MCM7 sequences) to address species boundaries in this group. In addition to morphological investigations, we used Bayesian clustering to identify potential genetic groups in the H. hypotrypa/H. flavida clade. We also used a variety of empirical, sequence-based species delimitation approaches, including: the “Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery” (ABGD), the Poisson tree process model (PTP), the General Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC), and the multispecies coalescent approach BPP. Different species delimitation scenarios were compared using Bayes factors delimitation analysis, in addition to comparisons of pairwise genetic distances, pairwise fixation indices (FST). The majority of the species delimitation analyses implemented in this study failed to support H. hypotrypa and H. flavida as distinct lineages, as did the Bayesian clustering analysis. However, strong support for the evolutionary independence of H. hypotrypa and H. flavida was inferred using BPP and further supported by Bayes factor delimitation. In spite of rigorous morphological comparisons and a wide range of sequence-based approaches to delimit species, species boundaries in the H. hypotrypa group remain uncertain. This study reveals the potential limitations of relying on distinct reproductive strategies as diagnostic taxonomic characters for Hypogymnia and also the challenges of using popular sequence-based species delimitation methods in groups with recent diversification histories.
机译:在密切相关的世系之间划定物种边界通常需要一系列独立的数据集和分析方法。与其他生物类别相似,真菌中强壮的物种限制在经验框架内得到了越来越多的研究。在这里,我们试图在亚洲特有的地衣形成真菌紧密结合群中定义物种边界,该植物属于催眠催眠(hypogymnia hypotrypa)群(Parmeliaceae)。在目前的分类中,hypogymnia hypotrypa组包括两个物种:hypertrypa和H. flavida,它们是根据独特的繁殖方式分离的,前者会产生疮疮,而后者则不会。我们使用表型特征和分子序列数据(ITS,GPD和MCM7序列)重新检查了这两个物种之间的关系,以解决该组中的物种边界。除了形态学研究,我们还使用贝叶斯聚类法确定了hypertrypa / H中潜在的遗传群体。黄素枝。我们还使用了多种基于序列的经验性物种划界方法,包括:“自动条形码差距发现”(ABGD),泊松树过程模型(PTP),通用混合圣诞联盟(GMYC)和多物种联盟接近BPP。除了比较成对遗传距离,成对固定指数(FST)外,还使用贝叶斯因子界定分析比较了不同物种的界定情况。这项研究中进行的大多数物种定界分析未能像贝叶斯聚类分析那样,将H. hypotrypa和H. flavida支持为不同的谱系。但是,强烈支持 H 的进化独立性。 hypotrypa H 。使用BPP推断 flavida ,并进一步得到贝叶斯定界的支持。尽管进行了严格的形态学比较和多种基于序列的定界物种的方法,但 H 中的物种边界仍然存在。 hypotrypa 组仍不确定。这项研究揭示了依赖不同的生殖策略作为低氧血症诊断分类学特征的潜在局限性,以及在具有近期多样化历史的群体中使用流行的基于序列的物种划界方法的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号