首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Do You Read How I Read? Systematic Individual Differences in Semantic Reliance amongst Normal Readers
【2h】

Do You Read How I Read? Systematic Individual Differences in Semantic Reliance amongst Normal Readers

机译:您阅读我的阅读方式吗?普通读者之间语义依赖的系统个体差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The extent to which meaning is involved in reading aloud has proven an area of longstanding debate, and current computational models differ on this dimension. The connectionist triangle model proposes that normal individuals rely on semantic information for correct reading of words with atypical spelling-sound relationships, but to varying degrees. This proposed individual difference would account for the varying stage of decline at which patients with semantic dementia first show the reading impairment known as surface dyslexia. Recent neuroimaging data has provided validation of this view, showing that individual differences in degree of semantic reliance during exception word reading predict the amount of activation in left anterior temporal regions associated with semantic processing. This study aimed to establish the cognitive correlates of individual differences in semantic reliance during exception word reading. Experiment 1 used a subgrouping approach with 32 participants and found larger imageability and semantic priming effects specifically for exception word reading amongst high relative to low semantic reliance readers. High semantic reliance readers also tended to read nonwords more slowly than low semantic reliance readers. A second experiment used a regression approach with 129 readers and confirmed the relationship of degree of semantic reliance both to imageability effects in exception word reading and speed of nonword reading. Further, while the performance of the higher semantic readers revealed no significant association with semantic processing tasks, there was a negative relationship with rhyme processing tasks. We therefore speculate that differences in phonological abilities may be responsible for varying degrees of semantic reliance in reading aloud. This proposal accords with the results of functional imaging showing that higher semantic reliance during exception word reading corresponds to lower activation in left pre-central gyrus, an area associated with direct spelling sound mapping and phonological processing. Our results therefore establish the nature of systematic individual differences in degree of semantic involvement amongst normal readers, and suggest directions for future neuroimaging and computational modeling research to uncover their origins.
机译:朗读所涉及的意义程度已证明是长期争论的领域,而当前的计算模型在此维度上有所不同。连接主义三角形模型提出,正常人依靠语义信息来正确阅读具有非典型拼音关系的单词,但程度不同。拟议的个体差异将解释语义痴呆患者首先表现出阅读障碍(称为表面阅读障碍)的下降阶段。最近的神经影像数据已经证实了这种观点,表明异常单词阅读期间语义依赖程度的个体差异预测了与语义处理相关的左前颞区的激活量。这项研究旨在建立例外单词阅读过程中语义依赖中个体差异的认知相关性。实验1使用了包含32个参与者的分组方法,发现较大的可成像性和语义启动效应专门针对高语义依赖读者和低语义依赖读者之间的异常单词阅读。高语义依赖阅读器也比低语义依赖阅读器更慢地读取非单词。第二个实验使用了具有129个阅读器的回归方法,并确认了语义依赖程度与异常单词阅读速度和非单词阅读速度两者的可成像性之间的关系。此外,尽管高级语义阅读器的性能显示与语义处理任务没有显着关联,但与韵律处理任务却存在负相关关系。因此,我们推测语音能力的差异可能是导致朗读时语义依赖程度不同的原因。该建议与功能成像的结果一致,该结果表明,在异常单词阅读过程中较高的语义依赖性对应于左前中央回(与直接拼写声音映射和语音处理相关的区域)的较低激活。因此,我们的结果建立了正常读者之间语义参与度方面系统性个体差异的性质,并为未来的神经影像学和计算模型研究提供了方向,以揭示其起源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号