首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Qualitative Analysis of Origins and Evolution of an Elastomeric Respirator-based Hospital Respiratory Protection Program
【2h】

Qualitative Analysis of Origins and Evolution of an Elastomeric Respirator-based Hospital Respiratory Protection Program

机译:基于弹性呼吸器的医院呼吸防护计划的起源和演变的定性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Elastomeric respirators (elastomerics) may serve as one alternative to disposable N95 respirator use in healthcare. We explored factors which drove elastomeric adoption and continued use in a large academic medical center. We conducted semi-structured and focus group interviews in 2015 with a) 11 leadership key informants (KIs) with involvement in the respiratory protection program (RPP) when elastomerics were introduced and b) 11 healthcare workers (HCWs) recruited from hospital departments assigned to use elastomerics. Interview transcripts and responses were open-coded to capture emergent themes, which were collapsed into broader categories and iteratively refined. Factors identified by leadership KIs as influencing elastomeric adoption included: 1) N95 shortages during 2009’s H1N1 influenza pandemic and 2) the presence of trained, certified safety professionals who were familiar with respiratory protection requirements. Factors identified as influencing ongoing use of elastomerics included: 1) cleaning/decontamination practices, 2) storage, 3) safety culture, 4) HCW respirator knowledge, and 5) risk perception. HCW users expressed dissatisfaction related to breathing, communication and cleaning of elastomerics. Other themes included convenience use of N95s rather than assigned elastomerics, despite perceptions that elastomerics are more protective. Through semi-structured and focus group interviews, we learned that 1) leadership introduced elastomerics due to necessity but now face challenges related to ongoing use, and 2) HCWs were not satisfied with elastomerics for routine care and preferentially used N95s because they were conveniently available at point of use. Although the impetus behind incorporation of elastomerics was clear, the most complex themes related to sustainability of this form of RPP. These themes were used to inform a broader questionnaire and will address the utility of elastomerics as a feasible and acceptable practical alternative to N95s in healthcare.
机译:弹性呼吸器(弹性体)可以用作医疗保健中一次性N95呼吸器的一种替代选择。我们探索了促使弹性体被采用并在大型学术医疗中心继续使用的因素。我们在2015年进行了半结构化和焦点小组访谈,内容包括:a)引入弹性体材料时参与呼吸防护计划(RPP)的11位领导关键线人(KIs); b)从分配给医院部门的医院医护人员(HCW)使用弹性体。访谈笔录和回复均采用开放式编码,以捕捉新出现的主题,这些主题被分为更广泛的类别并经过反复完善。 KI领导层确定的影响弹性体采用的因素包括:1)2009年H1N1流感大流行期间N95短缺,以及2)训练有素,经过认证的,熟悉呼吸防护要求的安全专业人员。可以影响弹性体使用的因素包括:1)清洁/去污方法,2)储存,3)安全文化,4)HCW呼吸器知识和5)风险感知。 HCW用户对呼吸,交流和清洁弹性体表示不满意。其他主题包括N95的便利使用,而不是指定的弹性体,尽管人们认为弹性体更具保护性。通过半结构化和焦点小组访谈,我们了解到:1)领导层由于必要而引入了弹性体,但现在面临着与持续使用相关的挑战; 2)医务工作者对常规护理对弹性体不满意,并优先选择了N95,因为它们易于获得在使用时。尽管加入弹性体的背后动力很明显,但最复杂的主题与这种RPP的可持续性有关。这些主题用于提供更广泛的调查问卷,并将探讨弹性体作为N95s在医疗保健中的可行且可接受的实用替代品的实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号