首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Double-Blinded Randomized Comparison of Medetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam and Dexmedetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam Anesthesia in Free-Ranging Brown Bears (Ursus Arctos)
【2h】

A Double-Blinded Randomized Comparison of Medetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam and Dexmedetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam Anesthesia in Free-Ranging Brown Bears (Ursus Arctos)

机译:美托咪定-替米敏-左拉西p和右美托咪定-替利密胺-左拉西am在散养棕熊中的双盲随机比较(Ursus Arctos)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared anesthetic features, blood parameters, and physiological responses to either medetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam or dexmedetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam using a double-blinded, randomized experimental design during 40 anesthetic events of free-ranging brown bears (Ursus arctos) either captured by helicopter in Sweden or by culvert trap in Canada. Induction was smooth and predictable with both anesthetic protocols. Induction time, the need for supplemental drugs to sustain anesthesia, and capture-related stress were analyzed using generalized linear models, but anesthetic protocol did not differentially affect these variables. Arterial blood gases and acid-base status, and physiological responses were examined using linear mixed models. We documented acidemia (pH of arterial blood < 7.35), hypoxemia (partial pressure of arterial oxygen < 80 mmHg), and hypercapnia (partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide ≥ 45 mmHg) with both protocols. Arterial pH and oxygen partial pressure were similar between groups with the latter improving markedly after oxygen supplementation (p < 0.001). We documented dose-dependent effects of both anesthetic protocols on induction time and arterial oxygen partial pressure. The partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide increased as respiratory rate increased with medetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam, but not with dexmedetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam, demonstrating a differential drug effect. Differences in heart rate, respiratory rate, and rectal temperature among bears could not be attributed to the anesthetic protocol. Heart rate increased with increasing rectal temperature (p < 0.001) and ordinal day of capture (p = 0.002). Respiratory rate was significantly higher in bears captured by helicopter in Sweden than in bears captured by culvert trap in Canada (p < 0.001). Rectal temperature significantly decreased over time (p ≤ 0.05). Overall, we did not find any benefit of using dexmedetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam instead of medetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam in the anesthesia of brown bears. Both drug combinations appeared to be safe and reliable for the anesthesia of free-ranging brown bears captured by helicopter or by culvert trap.
机译:我们使用双盲随机实验设计比较了40种麻醉的散养棕熊(Ursus arctos)麻醉事件中对美托咪定-替他敏-替他敏-左拉西p的麻醉特性,血液参数和生理反应瑞典的直升机或加拿大的暗渠陷阱。两种麻醉方案的诱导均很顺利且可预测。诱导时间,维持麻醉所需的补充药物以及与捕获相关的压力均采用广义线性模型进行了分析,但麻醉方案并未对这些变量产生差异性影响。使用线性混合模型检查动脉血气和酸碱状态,以及生理反应。我们记录了两种方案的酸血症(动脉血pH <7.35),低氧血症(动脉氧分压<80 mmHg)和高碳酸血症(动脉二氧化碳分压≥45 mmHg)。各组之间的动脉pH和氧分压相似,而在补充氧后后者明显改善(p <0.001)。我们记录了两种麻醉方案对诱导时间和动脉血氧分压的剂量依赖性作用。美托咪定-维他命-左拉西p的呼吸速率增加时,动脉二氧化碳的分压增加,而右美托咪定-维他命-左唑西am却不随呼吸速度的增加而增加,这显示出不同的药物作用。熊之间的心率,呼吸频率和直肠温度的差异不能归因于麻醉方案。心率随直肠温度升高(p <0.001)和正常采集天数(p = 0.002)而增加。瑞典直升飞机捕获的熊的呼吸频率显着高于加拿大涵洞捕获的熊的呼吸率(p <0.001)。直肠温度随时间显着下降(p≤0.05)。总体而言,在棕熊麻醉中,我们发现使用右美托咪定-维他命胺-唑拉西坦代替美托咪定-维他命胺-唑拉西坦没有任何益处。两种药物组合对于用直升机或涵洞诱捕的散养棕熊的麻醉似乎是安全可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号