首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of bacterial communities from lava cave microbial mats to overlying surface soils from Lava Beds National Monument USA
【2h】

Comparison of bacterial communities from lava cave microbial mats to overlying surface soils from Lava Beds National Monument USA

机译:美国熔岩床国家纪念碑的熔岩洞穴微生物垫与上层表层土壤中细菌群落的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Subsurface habitats harbor novel diversity that has received little attention until recently. Accessible subsurface habitats include lava caves around the world that often support extensive microbial mats on ceilings and walls in a range of colors. Little is known about lava cave microbial diversity and how these subsurface mats differ from microbial communities in overlying surface soils. To investigate these differences, we analyzed bacterial 16S rDNA from 454 pyrosequencing from three colors of microbial mats (tan, white, and yellow) from seven lava caves in Lava Beds National Monument, CA, USA, and compared them with surface soil overlying each cave. The same phyla were represented in both surface soils and cave microbial mats, but the overlap in shared OTUs (operational taxonomic unit) was only 11.2%. Number of entrances per cave and temperature contributed to observed differences in diversity. In terms of species richness, diversity by mat color differed, but not significantly. Actinobacteria dominated in all cave samples, with 39% from caves and 21% from surface soils. Proteobacteria made up 30% of phyla from caves and 36% from surface soil. Other major phyla in caves were Nitrospirae (7%) followed by minor phyla (7%), compared to surface soils with Bacteroidetes (8%) and minor phyla (8%). Many of the most abundant sequences could not be identified to genus, indicating a high degree of novelty. Surface soil samples had more OTUs and greater diversity indices than cave samples. Although surface soil microbes immigrate into underlying caves, the environment selects for microbes able to live in the cave habitats, resulting in very different cave microbial communities. This study is the first comprehensive comparison of bacterial communities in lava caves with the overlying soil community.
机译:地下栖息地具有新颖的多样性,直到最近才引起人们的关注。可进入的地下栖息地包括世界各地的熔岩洞,这些熔岩洞经常在天花板和墙壁上以各种颜色支撑广泛的微生物垫。对于熔岩洞穴微生物的多样性以及这些地下垫层与上覆表层土壤中的微生物群落之间的差异知之甚少。为了研究这些差异,我们分析了来自美国加利福尼亚州熔岩床国家历史遗址的七个熔岩洞穴的三种颜色的微生物垫(棕褐色,白色和黄色)的454种焦磷酸测序中的细菌16S rDNA,并将其与覆盖每个洞穴的表层土壤进行了比较。在表层土壤和洞穴微生物垫中都表现出相同的门,但共享的OTU(操作分类单位)中的重叠仅为11.2%。每个洞穴的入口数量和温度导致了观察到的多样性差异。在物种丰富度方面,垫子颜色的多样性有所不同,但差异不大。放线菌在所有洞穴样品中均占主导地位,其中39%来自洞穴,21%来自地表土壤。变形杆菌占洞穴的30%,表层土壤的36%。与带有拟杆菌(8%)和次要门(8%)的表层土壤相比,洞穴中其他主要门系是硝化螺旋藻(7%),其次是次要门系(7%)。许多最丰富的序列无法鉴定为属,表明高度的新颖性。地表土壤样品比洞穴样品具有更多的OTU和更大的多样性指数。尽管表层土壤微生物会迁移到下面的洞穴中,但环境会选择能够生活在洞穴栖息地中的微生物,从而导致洞穴微生物群落截然不同。这项研究是熔岩洞穴中细菌群落与上覆土壤群落的首次综合比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号