首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Community-based human–elephant conflict mitigation: The value of an evidence-based approach in promoting the uptake of effective methods
【2h】

Community-based human–elephant conflict mitigation: The value of an evidence-based approach in promoting the uptake of effective methods

机译:减轻基于社区的人与大象的冲突:基于证据的方法在促进采用有效方法中的价值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Human–elephant conflict (HEC) is a serious threat to elephants and can cause major economic losses. It is widely accepted that reduction of HEC will often require community-based methods for repelling elephants but there are few tests of such methods. We tested community-based crop-guarding methods with and without novel chili-based elephant deterrents and describe changes in farmers’ willingness to adopt these methods following our demonstration of their relative effectiveness. In three separate field-trials that took place over almost two years (October 2005 –May 2007) in two villages adjacent to Way Kambas National Park (WKNP) in Indonesia, we found that community-based crop-guarding was effective at keeping Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) out of crop fields in 91.2% (52 out of 57), 87.6% (156 out of 178), and 80.0% (16 out of 20) of attempted raids. Once the method had been shown to be effective at demonstration sites, farmers in 16 villages around WKNP voluntarily adopted it during the July 2008 to March 2009 period and were able to repel elephants in 73.9% (150 out of 203) of attempted raids, with seven villages repelling 100% of attempted raids. These 16 villages had all experienced high levels of HEC in the preceding years; e.g. they accounted for >97% of the 742 HEC incidents recorded for the entire park in 2006. Our work shows, therefore, that a simple evidence-based approach can facilitate significant reductions in HEC at the protected area scale.
机译:人象冲突(HEC)对大象构成了严重威胁,并可能造成重大经济损失。减少HEC通常需要基于社区的驱赶大象的方法,但这种方法的测试很少。我们测试了有无新型辣椒基象威慑剂的以社区为基础的农作物保护方法,并在我们证明了它们的相对有效性之后,描述了农民采用这些方法的意愿的变化。在印度尼西亚Way Way Kambas国家公园(WKNP)附近的两个村庄进行了将近两年(2005年10月至2007年5月)的三个单独的田间试验中,我们发现以社区为基础的农作物保育对保持亚洲象很有效。 (Elephas maximus)的未遂袭击比例分别为91.2%(57分中的52),87.6%(178分中的156)和80.0%(20分中的16)。一旦该方法在示范点被证明是有效的,WKNP周围16个村庄的农民就在2008年7月至2009年3月期间自愿采用了该方法,并且能够击退73.9%(203个中的150个)未遂袭击中的大象,七个村庄拒绝了100%的突袭行动。在过去的几年中,这16个村庄的HEC水平都很高;例如在2006年记录的整个公园的742起HEC事件中,它们占了97%以上。因此,我们的工作表明,简单的基于证据的方法可以促进在保护区范围内大幅度减少HEC。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(12),5
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e0173742
  • 总页数 13
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号