首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >PRESIDENTIAL SYMPOSIUM: INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS TO ADDRESS POLYPHARMACY THROUGH POLICY AND HEALTH AUTHORITIES: IGRIMUP SYMPOSIUM 2
【2h】

PRESIDENTIAL SYMPOSIUM: INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS TO ADDRESS POLYPHARMACY THROUGH POLICY AND HEALTH AUTHORITIES: IGRIMUP SYMPOSIUM 2

机译:总统座谈会:通过政策和卫生当局应对多方药业的国际努力:IGRIMUP座谈会2

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the first IGRIMUP symposium, we have concentrated on the wide variety of negative clinical outcomes of inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy (IMUP). There are also huge, negative economic consequences to individuals and societies. The second IGRIMUP symposium highlights the fact that in most countries, the extent of IMUP and its impact on the “geriatric boom burden”, are inappropriately appreciated and insufficiently addressed by decision-making authorities. Neither the academic health-related institutions nor governments or healthcare services seem to act forcefully enough to combat IMUP and reduce its negative impact on individuals and societies. Wise, knowledgeable, ethical medical doctors, pharmacists, nurses and other caregivers, are many times forced by the same health authorities to automatically implement clinical guidelines apparently representing good quality of care. However, these approaches may cause more harm than good in subpopulations of very old, those with comorbidity, dementia, frailty and limited life-expectancy (VOCODFLEX). Even patients with advanced cancer or non-cancer end of life situations, are prescribed “curative” and preventive medications many times until death. Professional healthcare givers mainly medical doctors and pharmacists are trying to invent and promote tools for improving screening, prevention and treatment of IMUP. However, unless the academy and policy-makers contribute much more, the caregiver’s chances to succeed in our fight against IMUP for the benefit of all of us, are slim.
机译:在首届IGRIMUP研讨会上,我们集中讨论了不适当的药物使用和多药店(IMUP)带来的各种负面临床结果。对个人和社会也有巨大的负面经济影响。第二届IGRIMUP专题讨论会着重指出,在大多数国家,IMUP的范围及其对“老人繁荣负担”的影响受到决策当局的不适当重视和不足。学术健康相关机构,政府或医疗服务机构似乎都没有采取足够有力的行动来对抗IMUP并减少其对个人和社会的负面影响。明智,知识渊博,道德高尚的医生,药剂师,护士和其他护理人员多次受到同一卫生部门的强制,自动实施显然代表了良好护理质量的临床指南。但是,这些方法在非常老的亚人群中(合并症,痴呆症,虚弱和预期寿命有限(VOCODFLEX))可能带来的弊大于利。即使是患有晚期癌症或生命末期的患者,也要多次处方“治疗性”和预防性药物,直至死亡。专业的医疗保健人员,主要是医生和药剂师,正在尝试发明和推广用于改善IMUP筛查,预防和治疗的工具。但是,除非学院和政策制定者做出更多贡献,否则照护者为我们所有人的利益而成功对抗IMUP的机会很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号