首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Interaction of 24-D or Dicamba with Glufosinate for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Glufosinate-Resistant Maize (Zea mays L.)
【2h】

Interaction of 24-D or Dicamba with Glufosinate for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Glufosinate-Resistant Maize (Zea mays L.)

机译:24-D或麦草畏与草甘膦的相互作用可控制抗草甘膦的玉米(Zea mays L.)中的草甘膦抗性大豚草(Ambrosia trifida L.)。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) giant ragweed is a problematic broadleaf weed in crops including maize and soybean in the Midwestern United States. Commercialization of crops with 2,4-D or dicamba and glufosinate resistance will allow post-emergence (POST) applications of these herbicides. Therefore, information is needed on how 2,4-D/dicamba will interact with glufosinate in various rate combinations. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the interaction of glufosinate plus 2,4-D and/or dicamba for control of GR giant ragweed, and to determine their effect on GR giant ragweed density, biomass, maize injury, and yield. Field experiments were conducted in 2013 and 2014 in a field infested with GR giant ragweed in Nebraska, United States. The treatments included POST applications of glufosinate (450 or 590 g ai ha-1), 2,4-D, or dicamba at 280 or 560 g ae ha-1 applied alone and in tank-mixtures in glufosinate-resistant maize. The results showed that dicamba applied alone resulted in 56 to 62% and 73 to 83% control at 14 and 28 days after treatment (DAT), respectively, and ≥95% control at 60 DAT or at harvest compared to 17 to 30% and 57 to 73% control with 2,4-D applied alone at 280 and 560 g ai ha-1, respectively. Glufosinate tank-mixed with 2,4-D and/or dicamba consistently provided ≥89% control of GR giant ragweed, except that control with glufosinate plus 2,4-D varied from 80 to 92% at 60 DAT and at harvest. The comparison between the observed and expected control (determined by Colby’s equation) suggested an additive interaction between glufosinate and 2,4-D or dicamba for control of GR giant ragweed. Contrast analysis also indicated that GR giant ragweed control with glufosinate plus 2,4-D or dicamba was either consistently higher or comparable with individual herbicides excluding 2,4-D applied alone. Herbicide programs, excluding 2,4-D at 280 g ae ha-1, resulted in ≥80% reduction in GR giant ragweed density. Tank-mixing glufosinate with 2,4-D or dicamba showed an additive effect and will be an additional tool with two effective modes of action for the management of GR giant ragweed in maize.
机译:抗草甘膦(GR)的豚草是美国中西部玉米和大豆等农作物中有问题的阔叶杂草。具有2,4-D或麦草畏和草铵膦抗性的农作物的商业化将允许这些除草剂的出苗后应用。因此,需要有关2,4-D /麦草畏如何以各种速率组合与草铵膦相互作用的信息。这项研究的目的是评估草铵膦加2,4-D和/或麦草畏之间的相互作用,以控制GR巨型豚草,并确定它们对GR巨型豚草密度,生物量,玉米伤害和产量的影响。在2013年和2014年,在美国内布拉斯加州被GR巨豚草感染的田间进行了田间试验。这些治疗包括以280或560 g ae ha -1 施用草铵膦(450或590 g ai ha -1 ),2,4-D或麦草畏的POST应用可以单独使用,也可以在抗草铵膦的玉米的桶混物中使用。结果显示,单独施用麦草畏可在处理(DAT)后14天和28天分别达到56%至62%和73%至83%的控制,在60天DAT或收获时分别达到≥95%的控制,而17%至30%和分别以280和560 g ai ha -1 分别施用2,4-D,可控制57%至73%的控制。与2,4-D和/或麦草畏混合的草铵膦始终提供对GR巨型豚草的≥89%的控制,除了在60 DAT和收获时使用草铵膦加2,4-D的控制范围从80%到92%不等。观察到的和预期控制的比较(由Colby方程确定)表明,草铵膦与2,4-D或麦草畏之间存在加性相互作用,以控制GR豚草。对比分析还表明,使用草铵膦加2,4-D或麦草畏的GR豚草防治效果始终较高或与单独除2,4-D除外的除草剂相当。除草剂程序(不包括280 g ae ha -1 的2,4-D)导致GR巨型豚草密度降低了≥80%。将草铵膦与2,4-D或麦草畏进行桶混显示出加和效应,将成为具有两种有效作用方式的额外工具,用于管理玉米中的GR豚草。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号