首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Physiology >Comparative Analysis of 3D Bladder Tumor Spheroids Obtained by Forced Floating and Hanging Drop Methods for Drug Screening
【2h】

Comparative Analysis of 3D Bladder Tumor Spheroids Obtained by Forced Floating and Hanging Drop Methods for Drug Screening

机译:强制漂浮法和悬滴法获得的3D膀胱肿瘤球体的比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Cell-based assays using three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures may reflect the antitumor activity of compounds more accurately, since these models reproduce the tumor microenvironment better.>Methods: Here, we report a comparative analysis of cell behavior in the two most widely employed methods for 3D spheroid culture, forced floating (Ultra-low Attachment, ULA, plates), and hanging drop (HD) methods, using the RT4 human bladder cancer cell line as a model. The morphology parameters and growth/metabolism of the spheroids generated were first characterized, using four different cell-seeding concentrations (0.5, 1.25, 2.5, and 3.75 × 104 cells/mL), and then, subjected to drug resistance evaluation.>Results: Both methods generated spheroids with a smooth surface and round shape in a spheroidization time of about 48 h, regardless of the cell-seeding concentration used. Reduced cell growth and metabolism was observed in 3D cultures compared to two-dimensional (2D) cultures. The optimal range of spheroid diameter (300–500 μm) was obtained using cultures initiated with 0.5 and 1.25 × 104 cells/mL for the ULA method and 2.5 and 3.75 × 104 cells/mL for the HD method. RT4 cells cultured under 3D conditions also exhibited a higher resistance to doxorubicin (IC50 of 1.00 and 0.83 μg/mL for the ULA and HD methods, respectively) compared to 2D cultures (IC50 ranging from 0.39 to 0.43).>Conclusions: Comparing the results, we concluded that the forced floating method using ULA plates was considered more suitable and straightforward to generate RT4 spheroids for drug screening/cytotoxicity assays. The results presented here also contribute to the improvement in the standardization of the 3D cultures required for widespread application.
机译:>简介:使用三维(3D)细胞培养物进行的基于细胞的测定可能更准确地反映化合物的抗肿瘤活性,因为这些模型可以更好地再现肿瘤的微环境。>方法:在这里,我们报告使用RT4人膀胱癌细胞对3D球体培养,强制漂浮(超低附着,ULA,平板)和悬滴(HD)方法这两种最广泛使用的方法进行细胞行为的比较分析。线作为模型。首先使用四种不同的细胞接种浓度(0.5、1.25、2.5和3.75×10 4 细胞/ mL)表征所生成的球体的形态参数和生长/代谢,然后对其进行处理>结果:这两种方法均会在大约48小时的球化时间内生成具有光滑表面和圆形形状的球体,而与所使用的细胞接种浓度无关。与二维(2D)培养相比,在3D培养中观察到细胞生长和代谢降低。使用ULA方法以0.5和1.25×10 4 细胞/ mL起始培养,以2.5和3.75×10 4 。 sup>细胞/ mL用于HD方法。与2D培养相比,在3D条件下培养的RT4细胞对阿霉素的抵抗力也更高(IC50分别为1.00和0.83μg/ mL,对于ULA和HD方法)(IC50为0.39至0.43)。>结论:< / strong>比较结果,我们得出结论,认为使用ULA平板的强制漂浮方法更适合直接生成RT4球体,用于药物筛选/细胞毒性测定。这里介绍的结果也有助于广泛应用所需的3D文化标准化的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号