首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Measuring Perceptions Related to E-Cigarettes: Important Principles and Next Steps to Enhance Study Validity
【2h】

Measuring Perceptions Related to E-Cigarettes: Important Principles and Next Steps to Enhance Study Validity

机译:测量与电子烟相关的知觉:提高研究有效性的重要原则和下一步

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Measuring perceptions associated with e-cigarette use can provide valuable information to help explain why youth and adults initiate and continue to use e-cigarettes. However, given the complexity of e-cigarette devices and their continuing evolution, measures of perceptions of this product have varied greatly. Our goal, as members of the working group on e-cigarette measurement within the Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science (TCORS) network, is to provide guidance to researchers developing surveys concerning e-cigarette perceptions. We surveyed the 14 TCORS sites and received and reviewed 371 e-cigarette perception items from seven sites. We categorized the items based on types of perceptions asked, and identified measurement approaches that could enhance data validity and approaches that researchers may consider avoiding. The committee provides suggestions in four areas: (1) perceptions of benefits, (2) harm perceptions, (3) addiction perceptions, and (4) perceptions of social norms. Across these 4 areas, the most appropriate way to assess e-cigarette perceptions depends largely on study aims. The type and number of items used to examine e-cigarette perceptions will also vary depending on respondents’ e-cigarette experience (i.e., user vs. non-user), level of experience (e.g., experimental vs. established), type of e-cigarette device (e.g., cig-a-like, mod), and age. Continuous formative work is critical to adequately capture perceptions in response to the rapidly changing e-cigarette landscape. Most important, it is imperative to consider the unique perceptual aspects of e-cigarettes, building on the conventional cigarette literature as appropriate, but not relying on existing conventional cigarette perception items without adjustment.
机译:衡量与电子烟使用相关的看法可以提供有价值的信息,以帮助解释为什么青年和成年人会发起并继续使用电子烟。但是,鉴于电子烟设备的复杂性及其持续发展,人们对该产品的认知程度差异很大。作为烟草业管制科学中心(TCORS)网络内电子烟测量工作组的成员,我们的目标是为研究人员开展有关电子烟感知的调查提供指导。我们调查了14个TCORS网站,并从7个网站接收并审查了371项电子烟感知项目。我们根据要求的感知类型对项目进行了分类,并确定了可以提高数据有效性的测量方法以及研究人员可能考虑避免的方法。该委员会在四个方面提出建议:(1)对收益的看法,(2)对伤害的看法,(3)对成瘾的看法以及(4)对社会规范的看法。在这四个领域中,评估电子烟知觉的最合适方法主要取决于研究目标。用于检查电子烟知觉的物品的类型和数量也将根据受访者的电子烟体验(即用户与非用户),体验水平(例如实验性与已建立),电子类型而变化。香烟装置(例如,类似Cig-a的香烟)和年龄。持续的形成性工作对于响应迅速变化的电子烟景观,充分捕捉认知至关重要。最重要的是,有必要在适当的常规卷烟文献基础上考虑电子烟的独特感性方面,而不要依靠现有的常规卷烟感知项目而不进行调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号