首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Internal conflict market uniformity and transparency in price competition between teams
【2h】

Internal conflict market uniformity and transparency in price competition between teams

机译:内部冲突市场统一性和团队之间价格竞争的透明度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The way profits are divided within successful teams imposes different degrees of internal conflict. We experimentally examine how the level of internal conflict, and whether such conflict is transparent to other teams, affects teams' ability to compete vis-à-vis each other, and, consequently, market outcomes. Participants took part in a repeated Bertrand duopoly game between three-player teams which had either the same or different level of internal conflict (uniform vs. mixed). Profit division was either private-pay (high conflict; each member received her own asking price) or equal-pay (low conflict; profits were divided equally). We find that internal conflict leads to (tacit) coordination on high prices in uniform private-pay duopolies, but places private-pay teams at a competitive disadvantage in mixed duopolies. Competition is softened by transparency in uniform markets, but intensified in mixed markets. We propose an explanation of the results and discuss implications for managers and policy makers. (D43, L22, C92)
机译:成功团队中利润分配的方式会产生不同程度的内部冲突。我们通过实验研究内部冲突的程度以及这种冲突对其他团队是否透明,如何影响团队相互竞争的能力,进而影响市场结果。参与者参加了重复的Bertrand双寡头游戏,这三支球队的内部冲突水平相同或不同(统一vs.混合)。利润分配是私人支付(冲突高;每个成员都有自己的要价)或同工同酬(冲突低;利润均分)。我们发现,内部冲突导致统一的私人付费双重市场对高价的(默契)协调,但在混合双重市场中私人付费团队处于竞争劣势。统一市场的透明度使竞争减弱了,但混合市场的竞争加剧了竞争。我们建议对结果进行解释,并讨论对管理人员和决策者的影响。 (D43,L22,C92)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号