首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Spatial patterns of the United States National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) land-cover change thematic accuracy (2001–2011)
【2h】

Spatial patterns of the United States National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) land-cover change thematic accuracy (2001–2011)

机译:美国国家土地覆被数据集(NLCD)土地覆被变化的空间格局主题精度(2001-2011年)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research on spatial non-stationarity of land-cover classification accuracy has been ongoing for over two decades with most of the work focusing on single date maps. We extend the understanding of thematic map accuracy spatial patterns by: (1) quantifying spatial patterns of map-reference agreement for class-specific land-cover change rather than class-specific land cover for both omission and commission expressions of map error; (2) reporting goodness-of-fit estimates for the empirical models, which have been lacking in previous assessments, and; (3) using the empirical model results to map the locations of the relative likelihoods of map-reference agreement for specific land-cover change classes. We evaluated 10 map-based explanatory variables in single and multivariable logistic regression models to predict the likelihood of agreement between map and reference land-cover change (2001–2011) labels using the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2011 land cover and accuracy data. Logistic models for omission error had better goodness-of-fit estimates than models for commission error. For the omission error models, the explanatory variable, density of the mapped class-specific change in the immediate neighbourhood surrounding the sample pixel, produced the best model fit results (Tjur coefficient of discrimination, D, ranged from 0.59 to 0.98) compared to multivariable models and all other single explanatory variable models. Maps of the predicted likelihood of map-reference agreement produced from the best fitting omission error models provide a spatially explicit description of spatial variation of classification uncertainty at both local and regional scales. Application of the models indicated higher likelihoods of agreement (>50%) comprised a greater proportion of the land-cover change class area than the proportion of the land-cover change class with lower likelihoods of agreement. NLCD users can apply reported equations to map land-cover change uncertainty.
机译:土地覆被分类准确性的空间非平稳性研究已经进行了二十多年,大部分工作集中在单一日期图上。我们通过以下方式扩展对专题地图精度空间模式的理解:(1)量化针对特定类别的土地覆被变化的地图参考协议的空间模式,而不是针对地图误差的遗漏和委托表达的特定类别的土地覆盖; (2)报告以前评估中缺乏的经验模型的拟合优度估计;以及(3)使用经验模型结果来绘制特定土地覆被变化类别的地图参考协议相对可能性的位置图。我们使用国家土地覆盖数据库(NLCD)2011土地覆盖率和准确性数据,在单变量和多变量Logistic回归模型中评估了10个基于地图的解释变量,以预测地图与参考土地覆盖变化(2001-2011)标签之间达成一致的可能性。 。与遗漏误差模型相比,用于遗漏误差的逻辑模型具有更好的拟合优度估计。对于遗漏误差模型,与多变量相比,解释变量,样本像素周围紧邻区域中映射的类特定变化的密度产生了最佳的模型拟合结果(Tjur鉴别系数D,范围从0.59至0.98)。模型和所有其他单一解释性变量模型。由最佳拟合遗漏误差模型生成的地图参考协议的预计似然性地图可在局部和区域尺度上提供分类不确定性空间变化的空间明确描述。模型的应用表明,达成协议的可能性更高(> 50%),占土地覆盖变化类别面积的比例要大于具有更低协议可能性的土地覆盖变化类别的比例。 NLCD用户可以应用报告的方程式来绘制土地覆盖变化的不确定性。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(39),6
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 1729–1743
  • 总页数 20
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号