首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Is Inquiry Science Instruction Effective for English Language Learners? A Meta-Analytic Review
【2h】

Is Inquiry Science Instruction Effective for English Language Learners? A Meta-Analytic Review

机译:探究式科学教学对英语学习者有效吗?荟萃分析评论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite being among the fastest growing segments of the student population, English Language Learners (ELLs) have yet to attain the same academic success as their English-proficient peers, particularly in science. In an effort to support the pedagogical needs of this group, educators have been urged to adopt inquiry approaches to science instruction. Whereas inquiry instruction has been shown to improve science outcomes for non-ELLs, systematic evidence in support of its effectiveness with ELLs has yet to be established. The current meta-analysis summarizes the effect of inquiry instruction on the science achievement of ELLs in elementary school. Although an analysis of 26 articles confirmed that inquiry instruction produced significantly greater impacts on measures of science achievement for ELLs compared to direct instruction, there was still a differential learning effect suggesting greater efficacy for non-ELLs compared to ELLs. Contextual factors that moderate these effects are identified and discussed.
机译:尽管英语学习者(ELL)是学生人数增长最快的群体之一,但他们尚未获得与英语熟练的同龄人一样的学术成就,尤其是在科学领域。为了支持该群体的教学需求,敦促教育工作者对科学教学采用探究方法。尽管已经显示出探究指导可以改善非ELL的科学成果,但尚未建立支持其对ELL有效性的系统证据。当前的荟萃分析总结了探究教学对小学ELLs科学成就的影响。尽管对26篇文章的分析证实,与直接教学相比,询问式教学对ELL的科学成就测评产生了显着更大的影响,但仍存在差异学习效果,表明非ELL的疗效比ELL更高。确定并讨论了调节这些影响的上下文因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号