首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Examining Sources and Mechanisms of Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Comparing English Learners and Non-English Learners within the Simple View of Reading
【2h】

Examining Sources and Mechanisms of Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Comparing English Learners and Non-English Learners within the Simple View of Reading

机译:审查阅读理解困难的来源和机制:在阅读的简单视野内比较英语学习者和非英语学习者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the present study, we compared the extent to which linguistic comprehension (vocabulary and listening comprehension) and word reading explain reading comprehension differentially for English learners (ELs) and non-ELs with reading difficulties, and we investigated whether different mechanisms of reading comprehension failure exist for each group. Using the simple view of reading as our framework, we tested a model in which vocabulary exerts a direct effect on reading comprehension and indirect effects through listening comprehension and word reading. Results from a multigroup structural equation model with a sample of 446 struggling fourth-grade readers (n = 229 for ELs; n = 211 for non-ELs) demonstrated both similarities and differences in the sources and mechanisms of reading comprehension difficulties for ELs and non-ELs with reading problems. Word reading was an important source of reading comprehension difficulty for both groups. For non-ELs, the effect of word reading was larger than the effects of linguistic comprehension (vocabulary and listening comprehension combined); however, for ELs, the effects of linguistic comprehension were greater than the effect of word reading. Vocabulary had indirect effects via both listening comprehension and word reading for ELs, but it demonstrated a direct effect on reading comprehension for non-ELs. These results suggest that developing a range of linguistic comprehension skills (e.g., word-level and sentence-level language skills) may be important for ELs with reading comprehension difficulties in the upper-elementary grades.
机译:在本研究中,我们比较了语言理解(词汇和听力理解)和单词阅读对阅读困难的英语学习者(EL)和非阅读者非英语学习者以不同方式解释阅读理解的程度,并且我们调查了阅读理解失败的机制是否不同每个组都存在。以简单的阅读观点为框架,我们测试了一个模型,其中词汇对阅读理解产生直接影响,而听力理解和单词阅读则对间接影响。来自多组结构方程模型的结果以446个挣扎的四年级阅读器样本(对于ELs,n = 229;对于非ELs,n = 211)为样本,显示了对ELs和非ELs的阅读理解困难的来源和机制的相似性和差异-ELs有阅读问题。单词阅读是两组阅读理解难度的重要来源。对于非英语者,单词阅读的效果要大于语言理解的效果(词汇和听力理解相结合)。然而,对于英语语言学习者来说,语言理解的影响要大于单词阅读的影响。词汇通过听力理解和单词阅读对英语语言有间接影响,但对非英语单词的阅读理解有直接影响。这些结果表明,发展一系列语言理解能力(例如单词级和句子级语言技能)对于阅读能力较高的英语学习者可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号