首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
【2h】

Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation

机译:选择性淋巴结照射为接受确定性放疗相对于累及区照射的淋巴结阳性食管鳞状细胞癌患者提供了更好的治疗方式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).From January 2006 to December 2012, 644 patients (ENI = 157, IFI = 487) with stage I to IVa ESCC (AJCC 2010) at our institution were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify 471 (ENI = 157, IFI = 314) well-balanced patients for comparison. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of the study.After PSM, the median OS was 26.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9–35.7) for the ENI arm versus 21.5 (95% CI: 17.9–25.1) months in the IFI arm. The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS were 77.1%, 42.0%, and 26.1% for the ENI arm versus 73.2%, 32.2%, and 19.0% for the IFI arm (P = .020). ENI was a significant independent predictor of 5-year OS (1.301 [1.052–1.609]; P = .015). Furthermore, patients with stage I/II ESCC or lymph node (LN) positivity in the ENI arm had significantly better 5-year OS than their counterparts in the IFI arm. In addition, for LN positivity patients treated with definitive radiotherapy alone, ENI tended to prolong OS compared with IFI (P = .035). The 2 arms were comparable in toxicities.Using IMRT, ENI is superior to IFI in improving OS of ESCC patients, with acceptable toxicities that were comparable to those to IFI, especially for LN positivity ESCC patients treated with definitive irradiation alone. These results should be confirmed in a large randomized study comparing these 2 modalities.
机译:这项回顾性研究旨在评估2006年1月至2006年12月进行的选择性淋巴结照射(ENI)和累及场照射(IFI)对食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者进行强度调制放疗(IMRT)的疗效和安全性。 2012年,对我院644例I期至IVa ESCC期患者(ENI = 157,IFI = 487)进行了分析(AJCC 2010)。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于识别471名(ENI = 157,IFI = 314)平衡良好的患者以进行比较。总生存期(OS)是该研究的主要结果。PSM后,ENI组的中位OS为26.8(95%置信区间[CI],17.9-35.7),而21.5(95%CI:17.9-25.1)个月在IFI部门。 ENI组的1年,3年,5年OS为77.1%,42.0%和26.1%,而IFI组为73.2%,32.2%和19.0%(P = 020)。 ENI是5年OS的重要独立预测因子(1.301 [1.052–1.609]; P = .015)。此外,ENI组的I / II期ESCC或淋巴结(LN)阳性的患者的5年OS明显优于IFI组的患者。另外,对于仅接受确定性放疗的LN阳性患者,与IFI相比,ENI倾向于延长OS(P = .035)。这两个组的毒性相当。使用IMRT,ENI在改善ESCC患者OS方面优于IFI,其可接受的毒性可与IFI相媲美,特别是对于仅接受定剂量放射治疗的LN阳性ESCC患者。这些结果应在比较这两种方式的大型随机研究中得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号