首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effects of seniority gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients
【2h】

Effects of seniority gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients

机译:资历性别和地理对欧洲研究委员会(ERC)资助接受者的文献计量输出和协作网络的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Assessing the success and performance of researchers is a difficult task, as their grant output is influenced by a series of factors, including seniority, gender and geographical location of their host institution. In order to assess the effects of these factors, we analysed the publication and citation outputs, using Scopus and Web of Science, and the collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) starting (junior) and advanced (senior) grantees. For this study, we used a cohort of 355 grantees from the Life Sciences domain of years 2007–09. While senior grantees had overall greater publication output, junior grantees had a significantly greater pre-post grant award increase in their overall number of publications and in those on which they had last authorship. The collaboration networks size and the number of sub-communities increased for all grantees, although more pronounced for juniors, as they departed from smaller and more compact pre-award co-authorship networks. Both junior and senior grantees increased the size of the community within which they were collaborating in the post-award period. Pre-post grant award performance of grantees was not related to gender, although male junior grantees had more publications than female grantees before and after the grant award. Junior grantees located in lower research-performing countries published less and had less diverse collaboration networks than their peers located in higher research-performing countries. Our study suggests that research environment has greater influence on post-grant award publications than gender especially for junior grantees. Also, collaboration networks may be a useful complement to publication and citation outputs for assessing post-grant research performance, especially for grantees who already have a high publication output and who get highly competitive grants such as those from ERC.
机译:评估研究人员的成功和表现是一项艰巨的任务,因为研究人员的拨款产出受到一系列因素的影响,包括他们所在大学的资历,性别和地理位置。为了评估这些因素的影响,我们使用Scopus和Web of Science以及欧洲研究委员会(ERC)起始(初级)和高级(高级)受资助者的协作网络,分析了出版物和引文的输出。在本研究中,我们使用了2007-09年生命科学领域的355名受资助者。尽管高级受赠方总体上具有较高的出版物产出,但初级受赠方的总体出版物数量和最近拥有其著作权的出版物,其职位授予后的拨款增长明显更多。所有受赠者的协作网络的规模和子社区的数量均有所增加,尽管对于初级用户而言更为明显,因为它们脱离了规模更小,结构更紧凑的预先授予共同作者网络。初级和高级受赠人都增加了他们在授予后时期合作社区的规模。受赠人在岗后的授予前绩效与性别无关,尽管在授奖前后,男性初中受助人的出版物多于女性受助人。与研究水平较高的国家相比,位于研究水平较低的国家的初级受资助者发表的论文较少,合作网络也较少。我们的研究表明,研究环境对授予后奖励的出版物的影响比对性别的影响更大,特别是对于初级受赠者而言。此外,协作网络可能是出版和引文输出的有用补充,用于评估授予后的研究绩效,特别是对于那些已经拥有很高的出版产出并获得极有竞争力的资助(如来自ERC的资助)的受资助人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号