首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Assessment of respirator fit capability test criteria for full-facepiece air-purifying respirators
【2h】

Assessment of respirator fit capability test criteria for full-facepiece air-purifying respirators

机译:全面罩式空气净化呼吸器的呼吸器装配能力测试标准评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An ASTM International subcommittee on Respiratory Protection, F23.65 is currently developing a consensus standard for assessing respirator fit capability (RFC) criteria of half-facepiece air-purifying particulate respirators. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the test methods being developed for half-facepiece respirators can reasonably be applied to non-powered full-facepiece–air-purifying respirators (FF–APR).Benchmark RFC test data were collected for three families of FF–APRs (a one-size-only family, a two-size family, and a three-size family). All respirators were equipped with P100 class particulate filters. Respirators were outfitted with a sampling probe to collect an in-mask particle concentration sample in the breathing zone of the wearer. Each of the six respirator facepieces was tested on the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 25-subject Bivariate Panel. The RFC test assessed face seal leakage using a PortaCount fit test. Subjects followed the corresponding Occupational Safety and Health Administration-accepted fit test protocol.Two donnings per subject/respirator model combination were performed. The panel passing rate (PPR) (number or percentage of subjects in the panel achieving acceptable fit on at least one of two donnings) was determined for each respirator family at specified fit factor passing levels of 500, 1,000, and 2,000. As a reasonable expectation based on a previous analysis of alpha and beta fit test errors for various panel sizes, the selected PPR benchmark for our study was >75%.At the fit factor passing level of 500 obtained on at least one of two donnings, the PPRs for three-, two-, and one-size families were 100, 79, and 88%, respectively. As the fit factor passing criterion increased from 500 to 1,000 or 2,000, PPRs followed a decreasing trend. Each of the three tested families of FF–APRs are capable of fitting ≥ 75% of the intended user population at the 500 fit factor passing level obtained on at least one of two donnings. The methods presented here can be used as a reference for standards development organizations considering developing RFC test requirements.
机译:ASTM国际呼吸防护小组委员会F23.65目前正在开发一种共识标准,用于评估半罩式空气净化颗粒呼吸器的呼吸器适应能力(RFC)标准。这项研究的目的是评估为半面罩呼吸器开发的测试方法是否可以合理地应用于无动力全罩式空气净化呼吸器(FF-APR)。基准RFC测试数据收集了三个家庭FF-APR(一个单一尺寸的家庭,两个尺寸的家庭和三个尺寸的家庭)的数量。所有呼吸器均配备P100级颗粒过滤器。呼吸器配备有采样探针,以在佩戴者的呼吸区域收集口罩内颗粒浓度样品。六个呼吸器面罩中的每一个都在美国国家职业安全与健康研究院25个主题的双变量面板上进行了测试。 RFC测试使用PortaCount拟合测试评估了面密封泄漏。受试者遵循相应的职业安全与健康管理局接受的适合性测试规程,每个受试者/呼吸器模型组合进行两次捐赠。确定每个呼吸器家庭在指定的适应因子通过水平500、1,000和2,000下的面板合格率(PPR)(在两个捐赠中的至少一项上达到可接受的合格程度的受试者人数或百分比)。基于先前对各种面板尺寸的alpha和beta拟合测试误差的分析得出的合理预期,我们为研究选择的PPR基准> 75%。在两次穿脱中至少之一获得的拟合因子合格水平为500时,三,二和一尺寸家庭的PPR分别为100%,79%和88%。随着拟合因子通过标准从500增加到1,000或2,000,PPR呈下降趋势。 FF-APR的三个测试家族中的每个家族都能够以至少两次捐赠之一获得的500适应因子通过水平,满足≥75%的预期用户群体。此处提出的方法可用作考虑开发RFC测试要求的标准开发组织的参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号