首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effects of comfort care on symptoms gastric motility and mental state of patients with functional dyspepsia
【2h】

Effects of comfort care on symptoms gastric motility and mental state of patients with functional dyspepsia

机译:舒适护理对功能性消化不良患者的症状胃动力和精神状态的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common upper gastrointestinal disorder globally, but the current treatments for FD are still unsatisfactory. This study was aimed at investigating the effects of comfort care on symptoms, gastric motility, and mental state of patients with FD.One hundred consecutive patients with FD treated at the Wuhan Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) between 03/2016 and 02/2018 were randomized to routine nursing and comfort care on the basis of routine nursing (50 patients/group), all for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was FD symptom score. The secondary endpoint included gastric emptying rate, gastric motility parameters, and depression and anxiety scores. The endpoints were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks.There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for gender, age, body mass index, types of FD, and course of disease (P > .05). The symptom score in the comfort care group at week 8 was lower than in the routine nursing group (8.3 ± 2.4 vs 10.2 ± 2.4, P < .001). The gastric emptying rate in the comfort care group at week 8 was higher than in the routine nursing group (28.6 ± 5.1 vs 24.3 ± 5.5, P < .001). The fasting and postprandial dominant frequencies of electrogastrogram in the comfort care group at week 8 were higher than in the routine nursing group (1.9 ± 0.9 vs 1.8 ± 1.0, P = .004; 3.1 ± 1.0 vs 2.1 ± 0.9, P < .001). The postprandial dominant power of electrogastrogram in the comfort care group at week 8 was higher than in the routine nursing group (55.7 ± 11.5 vs 42.3 ± 12.5, P < .001). The cases of abnormal electrogastrogram rhythm in the comfort care group at week 8 were significantly less than in the routine nursing group (P = .003). The self-rating depression scale and self-rating anxiety scale in the comfort care group at week 8 were significantly lower than in the routine nursing group (42.5 ± 6.9 vs 47.3 ± 6.4, P = .001; 41.1 ± 7.2 vs 46.3 ± 6.9, P < .001).Comfort care reduces the symptoms of patients with FD, increases gastric emptying rate, improves gastric motility, relieves patient's depression and anxiety, and promotes the rehabilitation of the disease.
机译:功能性消化不良(FD)是全球常见的上消化道疾病,但是目前的FD治疗仍不能令人满意。这项研究旨在调查舒适护理对FD患者的症状,胃动力和精神状态的影响。武汉联合医院(中国武汉)在03/2016至02/2018之间连续治疗FD患者根据常规护理(50例/组)随机分为常规护理和舒适护理,共8周。主要终点是FD症状评分。次要终点包括胃排空率,胃动力参数以及抑郁和焦虑评分。在基线和8周后评估终点。两组在性别,年龄,体重指数,FD类型和病程方面均无显着差异(P> 0.05)。舒适护理组在第8周的症状评分低于常规护理组(8.3±±2.4和10.2±±2.4,P <0.001)。舒适护理组在第8周的胃排空率高于常规护理组(28.6±±5.1 vs 24.3±±5.5,P <0.001)。舒适护理组第8周的空腹和餐后占主导地位的频率高于常规护理组(1.9±0.9 vs 1.8±1.0,P = .004; 3.1±1.0 vs 2.1±0.9,P <.001 )。舒适护理组在第8周的餐后胃电图优势功率高于常规护理组(55.7±11.5 vs 42.3±12.5,P <0.001)。舒适护理组在第8周的异常胃电图节律病例明显少于常规护理组(P = .003)。舒适护理组在第8周时的自评抑郁量表和焦虑者自评量表显着低于常规护理组(42.5%±6.9 vs 47.3%±6.4,P = .001; 41.1%±7.2%vs 46.3%±6.9 ,P <.001)。舒适护理减轻了FD患者的症状,增加了胃排空率,改善了胃动力,减轻了患者的抑郁和焦虑感,并促进了疾病的康复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号