首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ambio >Understanding consistencies and gaps between desired forest futures: An analysis of visions from stakeholder groups in Sweden
【2h】

Understanding consistencies and gaps between desired forest futures: An analysis of visions from stakeholder groups in Sweden

机译:了解所需森林期货之间的一致性和差距:瑞典利益相关者团体的愿景分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conflicting perspectives on forests has for a long time challenged forest policy development in Sweden. Disagreements about forest futures create intractable deadlocks when stakeholders talk past each other. The purpose of this study is to move beyond this situation through the application of participatory backcasting. By comparing visions of the future forest among stakeholder groups, we highlight contemporary trajectories and identify changes that were conceived as desirable. We worked with four groups: the Biomass and Bioenergy group, the Conservation group, the Sami Livelihood group and the Recreation and Rural Development group; in total representatives from 40 organizations participated in workshops articulating the groups’ visions. Our results show well-known tensions such as intrinsic versus instrumental values but also new ones concerning forests’ social values. Identified synergies include prioritization of rural development, new valued-added forest products and diversified forest management. The results may feed directly into forest policy processes facilitating the process and break current deadlocks.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0746-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:长期以来,关于森林的观点相互矛盾一直对瑞典的森林政策制定提出了挑战。当利益相关者互相交谈时,关于森林期货的分歧造成了棘手的僵局。这项研究的目的是通过应用参与式反向广播来克服这种情况。通过比较利益相关者群体对未来森林的愿景,我们强调了当代的轨迹并确定了认为是可取的变化。我们与四个小组合作:生物质和生物能源小组,保护小组,萨米人生计小组和娱乐与农村发展小组;共有来自40个组织的代表参加了阐述这些组织愿景的讲习班。我们的结果显示了众所周知的紧张关系,例如内在价值与工具价值之间的张力,以及关于森林社会价值的新张力。已确定的协同作用包括优先发展农村发展,新的增值林产品和多样化的森林管理。结果可以直接输入到森林政策流程中,以简化流程并打破当前的僵局。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s13280-015-0746-5)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号