首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Physiological Reports >Comparison of multiple non‐invasive methods of measuring cardiac output during pregnancy reveals marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of cardiac output change between women
【2h】

Comparison of multiple non‐invasive methods of measuring cardiac output during pregnancy reveals marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of cardiac output change between women

机译:多种测量孕期心输出量的非侵入性方法的比较显示女性心输出量变化幅度存在明显异质性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Various non‐invasive methods are available to measure cardiac output (CO) during pregnancy. We compared serial measures of CO using various methods to determine which provided the least variability. Ten patients with spontaneous pregnancy had estimation of CO at baseline prior to becoming pregnant and at the end of the first and third trimesters. Echocardiographic data were used to estimate CO using the Teichholz method, Simpson's biplane method, and the Doppler determined velocity time integral (VTI) method. In addition, a Bioz Dx device was used to estimate CO by impedance cardiography. CO estimated with the VTI method had the lowest beat‐to‐beat variability. CO estimated with the VTI method was higher than CO estimated with the 2D‐Teichholz method and Simpson's method. The percent change in CO during pregnancy was similar for all echo methods (VTI, Teichholz, and Simpson's biplane). Baseline CO determined with impedance cardiography was higher than CO determined with the VTI method. However, change in style="fixed-case">CO during pregnancy was significantly lower when measured with impedance cardiography. There was marked heterogeneity in the degree of rise in style="fixed-case">CO during the first trimester (−3 to 55%). The wide variation in the gestational rise in CO was unexpected, and at least in part secondary to variable increase in heart rate. We recommend the use of the Doppler determined style="fixed-case">VTI method for the estimation of style="fixed-case">CO in pregnancy.
机译:可以使用多种非侵入性方法来测量怀孕期间的心输出量(CO)。我们使用各种方法比较了CO的系列测量值,以确定哪种方法提供的变异性最小。十名自然怀孕的患者在怀孕前和孕中期和孕晚期时的基线时估计了CO。超声心动图数据通过Teichholz方法,Simpson双翼法和多普勒测定速度时间积分(VTI)方法用于估算CO。此外,Bioz Dx设备用于通过阻抗心动图评估CO。用VTI方法估算的CO波动最小。用VTI方法估算的CO高于使用2D-Teichholz方法和Simpson方法估算的CO。对于所有回波方法(VTI,Teichholz和Simpson双翼飞机),怀孕期间CO的变化百分比均相似。阻抗心动图测定的基线CO高于VTI方法测定的CO。但是,当用阻抗心动图测量时,怀孕期间 style =“ fixed-case”> CO 的变化显着降低。在头三个月期间, style =“ fixed-case”> CO 的上升程度存在明显的异质性(-3至55%)。 CO的妊娠升高的广泛变化是出乎意料的,并且至少部分地继发于心率的变化。我们建议使用多普勒测定的 style =“ fixed-case”> VTI 方法估算孕妇的 style =“ fixed-case”> V

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号